2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2020.2988256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam Alignment and Tracking for Millimeter Wave Communications via Bandit Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…learning [364]. The results show that they can capture dynamic spatial patterns and adjust beam training strategy intelligently, without knowing priori information about dynamic channel modeling.…”
Section: Physical Layer Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…learning [364]. The results show that they can capture dynamic spatial patterns and adjust beam training strategy intelligently, without knowing priori information about dynamic channel modeling.…”
Section: Physical Layer Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an extension of model-driven AI and DL, an interactive learning design paradigm (ILDP) recently is proposed to make full use of domain knowledge of wireless communications and adaptive learning ability of AI and DL [363,364]. In contrast to the conventional model-driven approach that follows a non-interactive paradigm, the ILDP consists of communication model module and adaptive learning module, which work in an interactive manner, thus is able to extract useful information in real-time and sufficiently adapt to the ever-changing environments.…”
Section: Physical Layer Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where q(t) incorporates possible uncertainties caused by system or modeling error. To facilitate inference, a multi-output GP (MO-GP) is used to characterize the mapping in (19).…”
Section: A Coordinate Prediction Via Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the BA algorithms proposed in this paper, i.e., Algorithm 1, Algorithm 2 and Algorithm 4, are all designed based on GP learning, they are abbreviated as GPL-1, GPL-2 and GPL-4, respectively. In addition to the conventional hierarchical search (HS) based BA algorithm [4], several ML based BA algorithms proposed recently, i.e., direct upper confidence bound (DUCB) [16], hierarchical posterior matching (HPM) [20], partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) with some modifications [21] and stochastic bandit learning (SBL) [19], are adopted for comparison. EAR [19] and probability of successful alignment (PSA) are used as performance metrics to evaluate different algorithms.…”
Section: B Performance Of Beam Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%