2018
DOI: 10.1201/9781351165761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Regression Modeling with Inla

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
109
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The inla() function allows for missing values in the response variable, and computes the posterior marginal for the corresponding linear predictor. One does not need a posterior predictive simulation like in McMC approaches [36]. INLA will automatically compute the predictive distributions for all missing values in the response, which should be assigned a "NA" value when defining the data.…”
Section: Dengue Nowcasting Corrected For Reporting Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inla() function allows for missing values in the response variable, and computes the posterior marginal for the corresponding linear predictor. One does not need a posterior predictive simulation like in McMC approaches [36]. INLA will automatically compute the predictive distributions for all missing values in the response, which should be assigned a "NA" value when defining the data.…”
Section: Dengue Nowcasting Corrected For Reporting Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional sampling-based Bayesian analysis, the prediction can be done by posterior predictive simulation, i.e., drawing random samples from the posterior distribution. In the INLA library, there is no function "predict" as, for example, lm command in R. However, one does not need a posterior predictive sampling like in McMC approaches [36]. Predictions can be done as a part of the model fitting itself in INLA.…”
Section: Authors' Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, thanks to the availability of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samplers like JAGS (Plummer, 2003) or Stan (Carpenter et al, 2017), or the computationally efficient alternative provided by INLA, Bayesian computation has become increasingly accessible and more popular in the past decade. An advantage of the INLA approach used here over existing algorithms is that it circumvents time-consuming MCMC sampling by providing efficient approximations of marginal posterior distributions, and it has proven to be particularly useful for fitting GLMMs (Fong et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2018), spatial and space-time models (Blangiardo et al, 2013;Bakka et al, 2018), for modelling abundance data collected using distance sampling (Yuan et al, 2016), and for modelling species distributions more generally (Illian et al, 2013;Bakka et al, 2016). Here we discuss how to take advantage of INLA via its R interface R-INLA in the context of RSF and SSF modelling.…”
Section: Bayesian Computation For Rsfs and Ssfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial models fitted by Bayesian inference using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations are currently easily available (Banerjee and Fuentes, 2012;Bivand et al, 2015;Heaton et al, 2017). Although, for very complex spatial models, the MCMC method is still time and computationally demanding (Wang et al, 2018). The method called Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations (INLA) offers a faster and more friendly approach for fitting spatial models using spectra as covariates (Poggio et al, 2016;Rue et al, 2009).…”
Section: Regression Methods To Predict Plant Trait With Hyperspectralmentioning
confidence: 99%