2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2010.5502618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Localization in Sensor Networks: Distributed Algorithm and Fundamental Limits

Abstract: Abstract-Self-localization in ad-hoc sensor networks is becoming a crucial issue for several location-aware applications. This technology implies the combination of absolute anchor locations with relative inter-node information exchanged on a peer-topeer basis. In this paper we investigate a distributed algorithm and fundamental performance bounds for Bayesian cooperative localization in stochastic networks. Nodes are assumed to be randomly deployed within a finite space according to a prior distribution. Baye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this perspective, graph theory is a promising tool for describing the statistical relations existing among traffic observations at different, and typically nonuniformly distributed, locations or time instants. Unlike other contexts such as image processing, wireless sensor networks, wireless positioning, and decision making, in which Markov random fields (MRFs) and BNs [27]- [30] are now mature tools, the approach is relatively new in traffic estimation. Traffic can be view as an MRF defined over an undirected graph, whose nodes are associated with the traffic variable observed at different locations/instants, while edges define the relations existing among the variables according to the fluid-dynamic theory [31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this perspective, graph theory is a promising tool for describing the statistical relations existing among traffic observations at different, and typically nonuniformly distributed, locations or time instants. Unlike other contexts such as image processing, wireless sensor networks, wireless positioning, and decision making, in which Markov random fields (MRFs) and BNs [27]- [30] are now mature tools, the approach is relatively new in traffic estimation. Traffic can be view as an MRF defined over an undirected graph, whose nodes are associated with the traffic variable observed at different locations/instants, while edges define the relations existing among the variables according to the fluid-dynamic theory [31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) The message that node b sends to its neighbor at iteration k + 1 is computed following the approach in [27]. Particles are propagated from node b to node using the distribution ψ(s t,b , s t, ) to obtain the new set {s …”
Section: Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of distributed statistical inference in wireless communications are spectrum analysis in cognitive radio [1], (time and/or frequency) synchronization [2], and localization [3]. Let us consider N networked agents modelled as an undirected graph labeled in V = {1, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of these long-term propagation features is instrumental in cooperative and cognitive networks to optimize robust decentralized group-selection and resource-sharing strategies [5]. RSS-based cooperative [7]- [9] and non-cooperative [10] localization systems could also benefit from fast-converging distributed estimation of these channel features. For distributed estimation, in this work we propose to employ the consensus approach [11]- [14], based on successive refinements of local estimates at nodes with information exchange between neighbors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%