2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian latent class analysis to estimate the optimal cut-off for the MilA ELISA for the detection of Mycoplasma bovis antibodies in sera, accounting for repeated measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be due to different latent classes, as in previous study the comparison was made between an antibody test and PCR [ 16 ]. Another reason could be due to the circulation of other Mycoplasma strains and species, as was opted for the reason for the inferior diagnostic performance of this test on serum from Australian cattle [ 11 , 26 ]. Nielsen et al (2015) also proposed to adjust cutoff values, but from ≥ 37% to ≥ 50% to improve specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to different latent classes, as in previous study the comparison was made between an antibody test and PCR [ 16 ]. Another reason could be due to the circulation of other Mycoplasma strains and species, as was opted for the reason for the inferior diagnostic performance of this test on serum from Australian cattle [ 11 , 26 ]. Nielsen et al (2015) also proposed to adjust cutoff values, but from ≥ 37% to ≥ 50% to improve specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis was implemented in OpenBugs within the R statistical software ( 51 ) and RStudio environments ( 52 ) using packages r2OpenBugs ( 53 ). Programming code for the model implementation was adapted from Cheung et al ( 48 ) and Salgadu et al ( 54 ) and is provided in Supplementary Appendix S3 . The model was fit using non-informative priors for Bayesian estimates of Se and Sp due to either limited data (cPCR) or no published data (Biomeme and PCR-HRM) on C. burnetii detection in African ticks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%