2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00271-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian change-point analysis in hydrometeorological time series. Part 2. Comparison of change-point models and forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several tests to detect the presence of abrupt changes in the mean of the distribution of the variable of interest have been proposed and developed (Potter, 1981;Buishand, 1984;Perreault et al, 2000;Rodionov, 2004;Reeves et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2007;Beaulieu et al, 2009), each based on different assumptions, such as normality of the data, prior knowledge or not of the year of the changepoint, single versus multiple change-points. In this study, the presence of change-points in the mean and variance of the annual maximum discharge is examined using the Pettitt test (Pettitt, 1979).…”
Section: Change-point and Trend Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several tests to detect the presence of abrupt changes in the mean of the distribution of the variable of interest have been proposed and developed (Potter, 1981;Buishand, 1984;Perreault et al, 2000;Rodionov, 2004;Reeves et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2007;Beaulieu et al, 2009), each based on different assumptions, such as normality of the data, prior knowledge or not of the year of the changepoint, single versus multiple change-points. In this study, the presence of change-points in the mean and variance of the annual maximum discharge is examined using the Pettitt test (Pettitt, 1979).…”
Section: Change-point and Trend Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test significance is computed using the limiting distribution for continuous distribution in Pettitt (1979). The vast majority of the change-point tests in the literature is designed to detect abrupt changes in the mean of the distribution of the variable of interest, and only a limited number can detect abrupt changes in variance (Perreault et al, 2000). However, abrupt changes in variance can have a large impact on the frequency of extreme events (Katz and Brown, 1992;Meehl et al, 2000;Ferro et al, 2005), making their detection an important step when examining the stationarity of a time series.…”
Section: Change-point and Trend Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical inferences on the unknown parameters with regards to change point location can then be made based on this posterior distribution. Bayesian approach in change identification problem for mean level in time series data have been used by previous researchers such as by Smith (1975), Lee and Heighinian (1977), Booth and Smith (1982), Perreault et al (2000a;2000b) and Kim et al (2009). The Bayesian approach in this study is based on a single shifting model and takes into consideration non-informative prior distributions on the unknown change point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking inspiration from other research fields such as hydrology (Rao, 1996;Perreault et al, 2000aPerreault et al, , 2000b and avalanche science (Eckert et al, 2007(Eckert et al, , 2008 in which dealing with stochasticity is more common, this paper aims at defining a bouncing model explicitly distinguishing these different sources of variability.…”
Section: F Bourrier Et Al: Stochastic Bouncing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%