2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bats in the Ghats: Agricultural intensification reduces functional diversity and increases trait filtering in a biodiversity hotspot in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that Rhinolophus beddomei and Rhinolophus rouxii were both significantly more abundant in protected forests than in coffee or forest fragments (Tables and ); which is expected as they are typical “forest adapted” bats (Wordley et al., ). More surprisingly, Miniopterus pusillus , which has the long narrow wings and flexible echolocation calls seen in open air foragers (Wordley et al., ), was more frequently recorded in protected forest than in forest fragments. This may be because it can forage within the open understorey of protected area forests more easily than in the dense understorey of forest fragments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We found that Rhinolophus beddomei and Rhinolophus rouxii were both significantly more abundant in protected forests than in coffee or forest fragments (Tables and ); which is expected as they are typical “forest adapted” bats (Wordley et al., ). More surprisingly, Miniopterus pusillus , which has the long narrow wings and flexible echolocation calls seen in open air foragers (Wordley et al., ), was more frequently recorded in protected forest than in forest fragments. This may be because it can forage within the open understorey of protected area forests more easily than in the dense understorey of forest fragments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…() identified a need for more work on the ecological requirements of forest dependent bats and the response of forest assemblages to different land uses in Asia. Many bat species across South and South‐East Asia, particularly bats in the families Hipposideridae, Rhinolophidae, and the vespertilionid subfamilies Murininae and Kerivoulinae, have wing morphologies and echolocation call types that enable foraging in densely vegetated habitats but which are not effective for foraging in more open habitats (Kingston, ; Kingston, Francis, Zubaid, & Kunz, ; Meijaard et al., ; Wordley et al., ). We found that Rhinolophus beddomei and Rhinolophus rouxii were both significantly more abundant in protected forests than in coffee or forest fragments (Tables and ); which is expected as they are typical “forest adapted” bats (Wordley et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations