2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BASNet: Boundary-Aware Salient Object Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
798
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,102 publications
(811 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
798
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our method with 16 previous state-of-the-art methods, namely MDF [28], RFCN [18], UCF [20], Amulet [13], NLDF [12], DSS [31], BMPM [21], PAGR [50], PiCANet [51], SRM [16], DGRL [32], MLMS [52], AFNet [53], CapSal [54], BASNet [15], and CPD [55]. For a fair comparison, we use the saliency maps provided by the authors.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare our method with 16 previous state-of-the-art methods, namely MDF [28], RFCN [18], UCF [20], Amulet [13], NLDF [12], DSS [31], BMPM [21], PAGR [50], PiCANet [51], SRM [16], DGRL [32], MLMS [52], AFNet [53], CapSal [54], BASNet [15], and CPD [55]. For a fair comparison, we use the saliency maps provided by the authors.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second row, the appearance of the feet of the doll is different from the rest of the doll. While both scenarios have caused confusion for two recent methods (BAS-Net [15] and SRM [16]), our method (denoted as CAGNet-R) is capable of handling these complicated scenarios and generating a more accurate prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the proposed saliency detection method against previous 18 state-of-the-art methods, namely, MDF [13], RFCN [31], DHS [32], UCF [46], Amulet [34], NLDF [47], DSS [48], RAS [49], BMPM [33], PAGR [50], PiCANet [51], SRM [18], DGRL [17], MLMS [52], AFNet [53], CapSal [54], BASNet [55], and CPD [16]. We perform comparisons on five challenging datasets.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, a large number of edge information enhancement methods have been proposed [26][27][28][29][30]. Zhao et al [26] proposed to use the complementarity of edge information and saliency information to enhance the boundary and location information of saliency objects.…”
Section: Feature Concatenate and Dense Supervision Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the effectiveness of the DMS model with 16 saliency methods, including 12 traditional saliency algorithms (ITTI [40], LC [41], SR [42], AC [43], FT [44], MSS [45], PHOT [46], HC [47], RC [47], SF [48], BMS [49], and MBP [50]), and 8 deep learning methods (U-Net [51], FCN [19], R3Net [24], DSS [33], PiCANet [52], BASNet [29], PoolNet [53], and EGNet [26]). We implement the traditional saliency algorithm through the toolbox provided in [16].…”
Section: Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%