“…The sheer scale of the crisis, in terms of severity and breadth, and the extent to which it appeared to puncture the prevailing orthodoxy of fiscal and monetary policy, were no doubt contributing factors to the sense that 'big' policy ideas, such as basic income, were needed. More specific factors relating to the crisis and the response, such as sharp increases in (youth) unemployment, high levels of household and government debt, quantitative easing and then austerity, were drawn on by advocates to argue that a basic income was an apt policy response to these problems (Crocker, 2020;Painter & Thuong, 2015;Standing, 2011).…”