2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-6505(01)00003-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basement structure, lithology and permeability at Kawerau and Ohaaki geothermal fields, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Ma (Wilson et al, 1995). Lavas, ignimbrites and volcanic-derived sediments, collectively referred to as "volcaniclastic" rocks in this study, unconformably overlie Mesozoic greywacke and argillite rocks, collectively grouped as Torlesse composite terrane (Mortimer, 1995;Wood et al, 2001;Figs. 3, 4).…”
Section: Stratigraphy and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2 Ma (Wilson et al, 1995). Lavas, ignimbrites and volcanic-derived sediments, collectively referred to as "volcaniclastic" rocks in this study, unconformably overlie Mesozoic greywacke and argillite rocks, collectively grouped as Torlesse composite terrane (Mortimer, 1995;Wood et al, 2001;Figs. 3, 4).…”
Section: Stratigraphy and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ohaaki is situated in the eastern TVZ and is one of five fields where greywacke basement has been encountered, the others being Kawerau, Rotokawa, Ngatamariki and Tauhara (Wood et al, 2001;Bignall et al, 2010;Chambefort et al, 2014). Low permeability and porosity measurements obtained in greywacke rocks suggests that permeability in the basement greywacke is mostly secondary in origin and due to structures such as faults and fractures (Wood et al, 2001;Bertrand et al, 2012;Wallis et al, 2012;McNamara et al, 2014).…”
Section: Stratigraphy and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Paragenetic alteration mineral relationships (i.e., episodic veining and wall rock interrelationships) are also much better preserved in drill core samples. While previous studies have acknowledged potential geochemical and preservation bias in drill cutting samples relative to drill core samples (Kristmannsdóttir, 1982;Wood, 1996;Solum et al, 2006), few studies have quantitatively evaluated the significance of this bias and the implications for geochemical studies.…”
Section: Q14mentioning
confidence: 99%