2018
DOI: 10.1121/1.5042240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline-free guided wave damage detection with surrogate data and dictionary learning

Abstract: In guided wave structural health monitoring, damage detection is often accomplished by comparing measurements before damage (i.e., baseline data) and after damage (i.e., test data). Yet, in practical scenarios, baseline data is often unavailable. Data from surrogate structures (structures similar to the test structure) could replace baseline data, but due to small differences in material properties, such as thickness, temperature, and other effects, this data is often unreliable. In this paper, a dictionary le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This choice was made to keep the tube safe (i.e., healthy) in order to use it in other experiments, and to repeat any previous task if the corresponding result was not satisfying. Such a method for simulating damage was applied in different research works [21,22]. Actually, defect occurrence in a structure can be geometric (i.e., local change of the shape of the structure) or material (i.e., local change of the stiffness of the material).…”
Section: Experiments and Database Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice was made to keep the tube safe (i.e., healthy) in order to use it in other experiments, and to repeat any previous task if the corresponding result was not satisfying. Such a method for simulating damage was applied in different research works [21,22]. Actually, defect occurrence in a structure can be geometric (i.e., local change of the shape of the structure) or material (i.e., local change of the stiffness of the material).…”
Section: Experiments and Database Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different damage detection methods were developed and widely documented the literature [1]- [4]. In particular, the use of ultrasonic guided waves has proved to be one of the promising methods for detecting damage [5]- [8], specifically, with respect to the fundamental modes of Lamb [9][10] and non-dispersive Rayleigh waves [11]- [13]. Other studies were largely focused on understanding of guided wave interactions with and scattering at various types of defects [14]- [16].…”
Section: Structural Health Monitoring Using Guided Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…wavenumber. Substitute the equation to the equation of motion yields the Christoffel equations 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 K e< U < = 0 (8) and the parameters K e< are given by…”
Section: Governing Equations For Acoustoelastic Lamb Wave Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, a CNN has been tested to estimate CT.Th and bulk velocities using simulated ultrasonic guided waves [44]. In addition, similar machine learning-based approaches have also been recently introduced in non destructive testing in case of guided wave damage detection [45] or localization and characterization [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%