2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Base sliding and dynamic response of landfills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, variations of the mobilised friction angle may occur during the motion, which can influence the accuracy of the analysis (Matasovic et al, 1998;Zania et al, 2010b). Moreover, as found by different studies (Carrubba et al, 2001;De and Zimmie, 1998;Kotake et al, 2011;Zania et al, 2010a), the dynamic interface shear strength is difficult to evaluate because, in addition to the aforementioned parameters involved in static conditions, it is affected by various testing parameters typical of dynamic loading, such as motion amplitude, frequency content and duration.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, variations of the mobilised friction angle may occur during the motion, which can influence the accuracy of the analysis (Matasovic et al, 1998;Zania et al, 2010b). Moreover, as found by different studies (Carrubba et al, 2001;De and Zimmie, 1998;Kotake et al, 2011;Zania et al, 2010a), the dynamic interface shear strength is difficult to evaluate because, in addition to the aforementioned parameters involved in static conditions, it is affected by various testing parameters typical of dynamic loading, such as motion amplitude, frequency content and duration.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Most of available Newmarkian models, e.g., decoupled models [Makdisi and Seed, 1978;Bray and Rathje, 1998;Rathje and Bray, 1999;Baziar and Jafarian, 2006;Zania et al, 2008] and coupled stick-slip models [Lin and Whitman, 1983;Bray, 1999, 2000;Zania et al, 2010] estimate displacements by hypothesizing a constant inclination for failure surface. Accordingly, they neglect the decrease in the inclination of the Downloaded by [Chulalongkorn University] at 08:51 27 December 2014 sliding soil mass during its downward-stabilizing motion, which is observable in reality [Stamatopoulos, 1996;Chlimintzas, 2003;Stamatopoulos et al, 2011].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, some advanced numerical approaches, such as the finite element method (FEM) and finite difference method (FDM), have been employed to investigate the response and stability of landfills during seismic activities. Using the finite element method, equivalent linear analysis has been applied in many studies to investigate the seismic response of landfills [23][24][25][26]. Yet, the equivalent linear model was considered unsuitable for cases where the acceleration exceeds 0.4 g [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%