Barriers to climate-adaptive management: A survey of wildlife researchers and managers in Wisconsin

Abstract

Resource management agencies must be able to integrate current research into their decisionmaking to effectively address climate change impacts. In this study, we investigated the capacity for climateadaptive management by surveying the community of researchers, administrators, and field managers who are responsible for wildlife conservation in the state of Wisconsin, USA. We specifically measured differences in how these sectors perceive climate change risk, communicate, and make decisions to represent barriers in how they transmit and use research. We frame these barriers within the literature on evidence-based and adaptive management and risk psychology, as principles that underlie climate change adaptation. Almost all respondents agreed that the climate is changing (223/224), but 22% of the respondents were unsure whether climate change is negative for wildlife and field managers dominated this group (68%). Field managers also reported using components of adaptive management more frequently than did other sectors, but all three questioned the importance of one specific component: predicting the consequence of management before implementation. When seeking information, researchers preferred communicating via published literature, but managers and administrators reported a preference for in-person communication. Although only 29% of the respondents were currently involved in climate change work, 77% said they would get involved without additional incentives or direction at work. These results confirm a common pattern of barriers between research and management sectors across all scales of decision-making. Overall, results suggest that in-person and problem-based communication that is focused on real decisions and that utilizes social networks are a way to enable resource management communities to effectively confront these barriers. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Preparing Wildlife for Climate Change: How Far Have We Come?

“…Managers are accustomed to managing at local scales, and yet most strategies we uncovered were of broader geographic relevance (e.g., increasing connectivity, protected area prioritization). The continued proliferation and advocacy of broad‐scale recommendations and climate adaptation strategies can hinder the self‐efficacy of managers searching for local solutions to reduce the vulnerability of wildlife to climate change (Hagell and Ribic 2014, Allred et al 2016).…”

The critical social processes for standardising the ecological monitoring of Australian landscapes

“…Improved communication between researchers and applied sectors has been proposed as a practical step towards enhancing collaboration for adaptive environmental management (Brownson and Fowler, 2020; Allan and Watts, 2017;Hagell and Ribic, 2014). When researchers work closely with science endusers, constructive change is enabled because collaboration can immediately and directly address social obstacles.…”