2016
DOI: 10.4314/mcd.v11i2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barking up the right tree: Understanding local attitudes towards dogs in villages surrounding Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar can benefit applied conservation

Abstract: Exotic carnivores, particularly feral and domestic dogs, represent a serious threat to Madagascar's endemic fauna. We obtained information from the local community about dogs in villages in and around Ranomafana National Park (RNP), Madagascar. Surveys were conducted (N=359) to assess local opinions of dogs, reasons for owning dogs, and the willingness of dog owners to participate in spay/neuter/vaccine programs. Of surveyed individuals without dogs (N=211), 58.9% of respondents reported negative feelings towa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such programmes have been enacted by the Mad Dog Initiative in Ranomafana and explored in Barcala's (2009) study in Ankarafantsika, where associations have been observed between reduced dog and increased fosa trapping success. Support for sterilization programmes has been reported in Ranomafana National Park, where 90% of villagers' approved the use of neuter programmes if freely available (Valenta et al, 2016). If local sentiment is similar across Madagascar, the efficacy of such programmes should be studied to examine the relationship between exotic and endemic carnivore abundance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such programmes have been enacted by the Mad Dog Initiative in Ranomafana and explored in Barcala's (2009) study in Ankarafantsika, where associations have been observed between reduced dog and increased fosa trapping success. Support for sterilization programmes has been reported in Ranomafana National Park, where 90% of villagers' approved the use of neuter programmes if freely available (Valenta et al, 2016). If local sentiment is similar across Madagascar, the efficacy of such programmes should be studied to examine the relationship between exotic and endemic carnivore abundance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, dogs can also transmit rabies and form a general nuisance while they scavenge (Rajeev et al, 2019). Some dog owners have reported that their dogs harass and kill C. ferox around Ranomafana (Valenta et al, 2016;Kshirsagar et al, 2020). Data from live traps and camera traps suggest that C. ferox avoids dogs in several national parks (Figure 1), which may follow from a combination of aggressive interactions and disease transmission (Dollar et al, 2007;Barcala, 2009;Gerber et al, 2012;Farris et al, 2015;Pomerantz et al, 2016;Rasambainarivo et al, 2017;Merson et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human and introduced predator threats to C. ferox are summarized in shaded area below. zebu cattle (Figure 2, Decary, 1939;Rasoloarison et al, 1995;Goodman et al, 1997;Brockman et al, 2008;Hawkins and Racey, 2008;Gardner and Davies, 2014;Valenta et al, 2016). There is no published evidence for omnivory by C. ferox beyond possible occasional fruit consumption as a source of water during the dry season (Hawkins and Racey, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changing perspectives and risks associated with spaying female dogs can be found in databases as early as 1974 (2). This last decade has seen an explosion in literature regarding perspectives and attitudes in spaying female dogs, particularly an increase in either survey or ethnographic perspectives of specific populations regarding female canine spaying practices (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Additionally, closer examination of a range of disease conditions has potentially been associated with early female spaying (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%