2020
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.559659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mapping Study of Veterinary Literature on Perceptions and Attitudes of Female Canine Spaying

Abstract: This is a mapping study conducted to evaluate the characteristics of where content that engages in perspectives or attitudes on female dog spaying is published. Three databases, CAB Direct, PubMed, and Scopus, were systematically searched. There were 84 out of 642 papers identified and screened for relevance on attitudes or perceptions on female canine spaying. These 84 articles were then examined for recurring authors, institutional representation, and publisher information. Additionally, information regardin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further ring studies should be performed, correcting some biases. Surely, the inclusion of more pathologists with even more variable professional expertise form worldwide countries should be considered, in which impact and, therefore, experience in CMTs can be diverse (e.g., Mediterranean countries have more CMTs compared to the US due to cultural attitudes in spaying female dogs) [ 96 , 97 ] and the distribution of cases with variable more realistic frequencies, as it would be in standard routine diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further ring studies should be performed, correcting some biases. Surely, the inclusion of more pathologists with even more variable professional expertise form worldwide countries should be considered, in which impact and, therefore, experience in CMTs can be diverse (e.g., Mediterranean countries have more CMTs compared to the US due to cultural attitudes in spaying female dogs) [ 96 , 97 ] and the distribution of cases with variable more realistic frequencies, as it would be in standard routine diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%