2007
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2007.893755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bargaining Strategies for Networked Multimedia Resource Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
157
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
157
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the convexity for any two joint utility points X and Y in S is proved in [3], the feasible solution of our problem S also becomes convex. Therefore, this feasible utility set S is nonempty, convex, closed, and bounded.…”
Section: Bargaining Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because the convexity for any two joint utility points X and Y in S is proved in [3], the feasible solution of our problem S also becomes convex. Therefore, this feasible utility set S is nonempty, convex, closed, and bounded.…”
Section: Bargaining Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the model, users can change their service selections according to the expected utility of each service that is decided by the service providers. We adopted the Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solution (KSBS) [3], which guarantees fair resource allocations proportional to maximum achievable utilities of users. The second model is a repeated Stackelberg game between a service provider and the user group.…”
Section: Multimedia Service Discrimination Based On Fair Resource Allmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximization of the sum of users' expected video quality is considered in [4] using a pricing-based resource allocation mechanism which, however, doesn't guarantee convergence. Maximizing the system utility has also been analyzed for a cooperative environment within the framework of bargaining in [5], but this solution cannot be applied in the case of individual selfish users who are competing for some expensive resources. In [6], the authors make use of Ausubel's ascending-bid auction [7] to fairly allocate rate among different users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…게임이론은 대역폭 할당 [1,2] , 채널 할당 [3] , 네트 워크 흐름 제어 [4] , 전력 제어 [5] 및 비디오 압축 [6] 을 제안하였다. 그리고 NBS를 비디 오 압축 기술에 이용하여 그 효율성을 높였다 [6] .…”
unclassified