2005
DOI: 10.1002/esp.1206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barchan dunes: why they cannot be treated as ‘solitons’ or ‘solitary waves’

Abstract: Schwämmle and Herrmann (Nature, 2003, vol. 426, p. 619) have suggested that two subaerial barchan sand dunes could 'pass through one another while still preserving their shape' in a manner similar to solitons or solitary waves. A wide range of published field and wind tunnel evidence suggests that this assertion should not go unchallenged.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This question has come to a head because recent small-scale flume studies that report barchan-shaped current ripple dynamics (Endo et al, 2004) have been used to justify a type of numerically simulated subaerial dune interaction Herrmann, 2003, 2005) that does not accord with our contemporary understanding and empirical evidence of aeolian dune dynamics in the atmospheric environment (Livingstone et al, 2005). The similarity argument is also assumed as part of a universal scaling law for dunes forming in a variety of materials and fluids, including current ripples (Hersen et al, 2002;Claudin and Andreotti, 2006).…”
Section: Bare-sand Dunesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This question has come to a head because recent small-scale flume studies that report barchan-shaped current ripple dynamics (Endo et al, 2004) have been used to justify a type of numerically simulated subaerial dune interaction Herrmann, 2003, 2005) that does not accord with our contemporary understanding and empirical evidence of aeolian dune dynamics in the atmospheric environment (Livingstone et al, 2005). The similarity argument is also assumed as part of a universal scaling law for dunes forming in a variety of materials and fluids, including current ripples (Hersen et al, 2002;Claudin and Andreotti, 2006).…”
Section: Bare-sand Dunesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Most natural dune field interaction functions will not correspond with one of these examples (in particular, see Livingstone et al (2005) for a discussion about the unphysical nature of the soliton example). Instead, a natural dune field interaction function will probably be a combination of these extreme examples, with some regions where f(r) b r, some regions where f(r) N r, and transition points where f(r)=r.…”
Section: Implications Of the Interaction Function And Crossover Valuementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The concept originated from CA models of wind ripples (Landry and Werner, 1994), but has been independently proposed for aeolian dunes (soliton model of Schwammle and Herrmann, 2003; 'ejection' of Katsuki et al, 2005a). The exact dynamics of the dune models are doubtful because the downwind dune must emerge from within the separation cell of the upwind dune (Livingstone et al, 2005). A more probable scenario for bedforms with fl ow separation was shown with subaqueous barchan ripples by Endo and Taniguchi (2004), in which the lee eddy of the upstream bedform scours into the stoss slope of the larger downstream bedform, resulting in a scoured trough but also the emergence of a small bedform from the remnant crestline of the downstream bedform.…”
Section: Bedform Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%