1974
DOI: 10.2307/1442585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barbuligobius boehlkei, a New Indo-Pacific Genus and Species of Gobiidae (Pisces), with Notes on the Genera Callogobius and Pipidonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The description of this genus and species is detailed, well illustrated, and recent, and only a brief description of the Chagos specimen is offered here. Head pore and papillae patterns as illustrated by Lachner and McKinney (1974, figs. 2-3).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The description of this genus and species is detailed, well illustrated, and recent, and only a brief description of the Chagos specimen is offered here. Head pore and papillae patterns as illustrated by Lachner and McKinney (1974, figs. 2-3).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No differences between the present specimens and the type description could be found. Colour pattern just after collection is essentially the same as that when preserved (see Lachner & McKinney 1974 for description). The species was most frequently collected in the sheltered, marginally subtidal areas, usually over sand on the inner faces of rocky reefs.…”
Section: Family Gobiidaementioning
confidence: 94%
“…This study is an extension of the survey of gobies having prominent head barbels reported by Lachner and McKinney (1974). Many of the nominal genera of Indo-Pacific barbeled gobies are infrequently encountered and their taxonomic status is poorly known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At the time of our allocation of species to the genus Pipidonia (Lachner and McKinney, 1974: 878) we did not include Pogonogobins H. M. Smith (1931:37; type species Gobius planifrons Day) because (1) we could not adequately assess Smith's generic description, (2) Smith did not compare the genus with Pipidonia, which he described as new in the same paper, (H. M. Smith 1931:39), and (3) we were unaware that type material of Gobius planifrons Day was extant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation