2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2018.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BanSatDB, a whole-genome-based database of putative and experimentally validated microsatellite markers of three Musa species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we built the banana SSR marker database to store and to share the novel functional Musa SSR markers identified by our study. SSR marker databases have been developed for several plant species including rice [ 76 ], maize, sorghum, soybean [ 77 ], tomato [ 78 ], chickpea [ 79 ], pigeon pea [ 80 ], and also previously for banana [ 81 ]. The existing online genomic resources for Banana including the Banana Genome Hub ( ) (BGH), TropGENE Database ( ) and BanSatDb database ( ) also contain molecular marker information Among these three databases, BGH and TropGENE store only Musa SNP markers, while BanSatDb was developed for Musa SSR markers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we built the banana SSR marker database to store and to share the novel functional Musa SSR markers identified by our study. SSR marker databases have been developed for several plant species including rice [ 76 ], maize, sorghum, soybean [ 77 ], tomato [ 78 ], chickpea [ 79 ], pigeon pea [ 80 ], and also previously for banana [ 81 ]. The existing online genomic resources for Banana including the Banana Genome Hub ( ) (BGH), TropGENE Database ( ) and BanSatDb database ( ) also contain molecular marker information Among these three databases, BGH and TropGENE store only Musa SNP markers, while BanSatDb was developed for Musa SSR markers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSR genotyping has been extensively used over the last two decades to study the Musa genus, resulting in a huge amount of SSR markers currently available. Recently, genome-scale analyses have been carried out to classify SSR markers according to their usability for breeding programmes (Biswas et al, 2015), and an online database that contains more than 341,000 putative SSR markers from M. acuminata, M. balbisiana and Musa itinerans has been developed (Arora et al, 2018). However, only 580 (.16%) of them have been experimentally validated (Arora et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, genome-scale analyses have been carried out to classify SSR markers according to their usability for breeding programmes (Biswas et al, 2015), and an online database that contains more than 341,000 putative SSR markers from M. acuminata, M. balbisiana and Musa itinerans has been developed (Arora et al, 2018). However, only 580 (.16%) of them have been experimentally validated (Arora et al, 2018). In the present work, a set of 14 SSR markers has been selected from bibliography (Amorim et al, 2012;Miller et al, 2010;Passos et al, 2012) hybrid cultivars (Tables 1 and 2; Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the molecular marker databases deal with SSR markers as described in an earlier section of this article. Although some of the existing marker databases integrate molecular markers from Musa sp., among them SSRome [23], PMDBase [26], Banana Genome Hub [27], and BanSatDb [28] marker databases are notable. SSRome and PMDBase only integrate SSR marker data from the Musa acuminata genome; BGH and TropGENE store only Musa SNP markers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%