Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2015.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bandwidth enhancement in delta sigma modulator transmitter using low complexity time-interleaved parallel delta sigma modulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the clock speed requirement of the proposed time-interleaved polar DSM transmitter baseband part reduces four times (from 245.76 MHz to 61.44 MHz) using the four-branch time-interleaved structure while maintaining the signal quality ($41 dB). Furthermore, the comparison results of the proposed time-interleaved polar DSM transmitter baseband part and time-interleaved polar DSM transmitter baseband parts based on the methods described in Embrahimi and others and Khoini-poorfard and others [10,25] (Figure 3) and Kozak and others and Erfani Majd and others [26,27] (Figure 4) are listed in Table 2. They have exhibited almost the same SNDR performance for different numbers of parallel branches.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, the clock speed requirement of the proposed time-interleaved polar DSM transmitter baseband part reduces four times (from 245.76 MHz to 61.44 MHz) using the four-branch time-interleaved structure while maintaining the signal quality ($41 dB). Furthermore, the comparison results of the proposed time-interleaved polar DSM transmitter baseband part and time-interleaved polar DSM transmitter baseband parts based on the methods described in Embrahimi and others and Khoini-poorfard and others [10,25] (Figure 3) and Kozak and others and Erfani Majd and others [26,27] (Figure 4) are listed in Table 2. They have exhibited almost the same SNDR performance for different numbers of parallel branches.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardware growth of this time-interleaved polar DSM transmitter baseband part becomes proportional to M 2 by increasing the number of parallel branches (M). In Kozak and others and Erfani Majd and others [26,27], this high hardware complexity problem is reduced by deriving the polyphase equivalent transfer functions of DSM integrators based on feedforward and feedback matrices.…”
Section: Time-interleaved Architecture For the Polar Dsm Transmitter ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TCM uses set partitionaing and small number of states at the transmitter and Viterbi decoding algorithm is applied to the trellis, with surviving partial paths corresponding to partial signal sequences that are closest to the received sequences. DSM is a modulation technique for encoding analog signal into digital signal [9]- [12]. It is used to convert high bit-count, low-frequency digital signals into lower bit-count, higher-frequency digital signals as part of the process to convert digital signals into analog as part of a digital-to-analog converter (DAC).…”
Section: Principles Of Modulations: Tcm and Dsmmentioning
confidence: 99%