2017 IEEE East-West Design &Amp; Test Symposium (EWDTS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ewdts.2017.8110132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Banded correlation matrix model for massive MIMO systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second assumption naturally arises in the case of large antenna arrays, when the distant antenna elements experience negligibly small mutual correlation (i.e. the correlation coefficient , i j r is small, see, for example, [8]), thus the correlation matrix can be bordered by zeroing its elements with large indices yielding a banded model [9]:…”
Section: B Assumption Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second assumption naturally arises in the case of large antenna arrays, when the distant antenna elements experience negligibly small mutual correlation (i.e. the correlation coefficient , i j r is small, see, for example, [8]), thus the correlation matrix can be bordered by zeroing its elements with large indices yielding a banded model [9]:…”
Section: B Assumption Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this extent, several important notes should be pointed out: The one-step correlation coefficient was chosen in such a way (i.e., not exceeding ) as to comply with the existing results for the bordered correlation matrices (see [ 55 ]), where the maximum possible (that yielded physically meaningful results, i.e., positive-definite system correlation matrices) was (see [ 75 ]). The was chosen in such a way as to cover the case when all the users are active (maximum number of active eigenstreams).…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one-step correlation coefficient was chosen in such a way (i.e., not exceeding ) as to comply with the existing results for the bordered correlation matrices (see [ 55 ]), where the maximum possible (that yielded physically meaningful results, i.e., positive-definite system correlation matrices) was (see [ 75 ]).…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) the decrease of the cross-correlation properties is much greater (for example by 2 orders of magnitude for a 10-element array) and cannot be controlled by the exponential model. Hence it can be argued whether the impact of distant elements is small enough to be excluded from further evaluations thus resulting in banded correlation matrix structures [32]. As it was demonstrated earlier in [33] this can possibly yield further improvement in system performance.…”
Section: Correlation Matrices Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%