2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1606875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band offset determination of Zn0.53Cd0.47Se/Zn0.29Cd0.24Mg0.47Se

Abstract: The interband transitions of a single quantum well structure of Zn0.53Cd0.47Se/Zn0.27Cd0.23Mg0.50Se (lattice matched to InP) were evaluated using contactless electroreflectance at room temperature. From a comparison of the measured optical transitions with those calculated using the envelope function approximation we determined that the conduction band offset for this system is given by the parameter Qc=ΔEc/ΔE0=0.82±0.02, which yields ΔEc of 590 meV. Such a large conduction band offset may be useful for the de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of the signal from the well at 2.08 ± 0.005 eV was straightforward when we considered the 77 K PL signal at 2.156 eV and its thermal energy shift. The value of spin-orbit splitting, Δ 0 = 0.44 eV, was adopted from similar Zn content of ZnCdSe ternary compound [5]. Using obtained value for band gap E 0 and the value of Δ 0 we obtain E 0 + Δ 0 = 2.52 eV, which agrees well with the experimental value of Table 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The identification of the signal from the well at 2.08 ± 0.005 eV was straightforward when we considered the 77 K PL signal at 2.156 eV and its thermal energy shift. The value of spin-orbit splitting, Δ 0 = 0.44 eV, was adopted from similar Zn content of ZnCdSe ternary compound [5]. Using obtained value for band gap E 0 and the value of Δ 0 we obtain E 0 + Δ 0 = 2.52 eV, which agrees well with the experimental value of Table 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The parameters used in this calculation were obtained from reference [10]. As seen in Table 1, the calculation agrees well with the measured transitions when the parameter Q c = ∆E c /∆E 0 is equal to 0.80, which is in good agreement with the Q c values reported in reference 10 (0.82 ± 0.02).…”
Section: /Cmsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…1 and Table 1, there is very good overall agreement. There is only a small discrepancy in the E1L1 transition attributed to the small compressive strain present in the QW, which blue-shifts the E1L1 transition by 5 meV [5], improving the agreement with the experimental results. The identification of other near lattice-matched systems with large conduction band offsets, such as the one presented here, may yield practical alternatives for the design of QCLs with better performance.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%