2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22275-7_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band Lineup Theories and the Determination of Band Offsets from Electrical Measurements

Abstract: Abstract. Semiconductor heterojunctions have been used in the last decades to build devices with enhanced electrical or optoelectrical properties compared to those of equivalent homojunction devices. Examples of heterojunction devices are encountered in laser applications using band gap engineering possibilities in crystalline III-V compounds, and in bipolar transistors in crystalline silicon based electronics. More recently, heterojunctions formed between hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) and crystallin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another reference Device C, as reported in our earlier study, exhibited conduction band offsets (ΔE C ) of~0.27 and 0.28 eV, respectively, at the rear and front interfaces of cSi/a-Si:H. 66 Likewise, the valence band offsets (ΔE V ) were measured to be~0.33 and 0.32 eV at the rear and front interfaces, respectively, that are in agreement with the general band offset values required for junction formation and effective charge transportation. 77 Further analyzing the band diagram for Device C indicates that the energy barrier against electrons at the front interface between MoO x and a-Si:H enlarged to around 3 eV which is almost double the energy barrier created with i-a-Si:H as there was no any passivation stack present at the rear of Device B. Concomitantly, the hole barrier height at the rear increased to 3 eV as compared with around 1 eV in Devices A and B. The electron barrier height increases to more than 5 eV with an insertion of 1 nm SiO 2 insulator as a passivation layer that improves the electron-blocking potential of the device.…”
Section: Energy Band Diagram Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reference Device C, as reported in our earlier study, exhibited conduction band offsets (ΔE C ) of~0.27 and 0.28 eV, respectively, at the rear and front interfaces of cSi/a-Si:H. 66 Likewise, the valence band offsets (ΔE V ) were measured to be~0.33 and 0.32 eV at the rear and front interfaces, respectively, that are in agreement with the general band offset values required for junction formation and effective charge transportation. 77 Further analyzing the band diagram for Device C indicates that the energy barrier against electrons at the front interface between MoO x and a-Si:H enlarged to around 3 eV which is almost double the energy barrier created with i-a-Si:H as there was no any passivation stack present at the rear of Device B. Concomitantly, the hole barrier height at the rear increased to 3 eV as compared with around 1 eV in Devices A and B. The electron barrier height increases to more than 5 eV with an insertion of 1 nm SiO 2 insulator as a passivation layer that improves the electron-blocking potential of the device.…”
Section: Energy Band Diagram Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%