Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.362533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band-gap engineering in CdS/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inFabrication and characterization of Cu(InGa)Se 2 solar cells with absorber bandgap from 1.0 to 1.5 eV AIP Conf.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With similar GGI ratios for the CIGS films deposited by the co-evaporation processes, the corresponding bandgap energies are nearly the same. Nevertheless, the CIGS films prepared by the three-stage process had a double grading bandgap structure, meaning that the bandgap energies at the notch point of the V-shape grading structure had lower values than the effective optical bandgap energies [35][36][37]. Thus, the absorption edge of the CIGS films prepared by the three-stage process extended to the longer wavelengths than those of the films prepared by the other evaporation processes, as shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Cigs Solar Cells Prepared By Various Depomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…With similar GGI ratios for the CIGS films deposited by the co-evaporation processes, the corresponding bandgap energies are nearly the same. Nevertheless, the CIGS films prepared by the three-stage process had a double grading bandgap structure, meaning that the bandgap energies at the notch point of the V-shape grading structure had lower values than the effective optical bandgap energies [35][36][37]. Thus, the absorption edge of the CIGS films prepared by the three-stage process extended to the longer wavelengths than those of the films prepared by the other evaporation processes, as shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Cigs Solar Cells Prepared By Various Depomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…8,9 Especially the grading parameters within the space charge region (towards the front) seem to be critical. 7,8,11 Thereby, the extension in depth of the space charge region in Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 absorbers lies in a depth range of a few hundred nanometers, 9,17 where under solar cell operation, most of the photoexcited carriers are generated. Table II shows the characteristic PV parameters of devices made from absorber layers that have been deposited in the same deposition runs as the samples for the depth profile analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,8 However, a compositional grading can also be unfavorable for the device performance, which holds in particular within the space charge region. 7,11 Therefore a detailed knowledge of the gallium depth profile is highly desirable. Recent studies by D. Abou-Ras et al 12 and C. L. Perkins 13 emphasize the necessity for comparative investigations of elemental depth profiles by different analytical tools to achieve reliable results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model implemented for interface transport in SCAPS is thermionic emission. The thermal velocity of the interface transport equals the smallest thermal velocity of the two neighboring layers [11]. For the defect, we use the same definition for interface defects and bulk defects.…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%