2013
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ballistic-like supercurrent in suspended graphene Josephson weak links

Abstract: The interplay of the massless Dirac fermions in graphene and the Cooper pair states in a superconductor has the potential to give rise to exotic physical phenomena and useful device applications. But to date, the junctions formed between graphene and superconductors on conventional substrates have been highly disordered. Charge scattering and potential fluctuations caused by such disorder are believed to have prevented the emergence or observation of new physics. Here we propose to address this problem by form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
91
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of switching depends intimately on the JJ critical current I c , which takes on different forms as a function of temperature depending on whether the JJ is short or long and whether it is diffusive or ballistic. Superconductor-graphene-superconductor JJs have been studied in these different regimes [16][17][18][19][20][21]. However, experimental values, such as I c and the parameters in the long diffusive junction, have fallen short of theoretical expectations due to impurity doping.…”
Section: Graphene-based Josephson Junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rate of switching depends intimately on the JJ critical current I c , which takes on different forms as a function of temperature depending on whether the JJ is short or long and whether it is diffusive or ballistic. Superconductor-graphene-superconductor JJs have been studied in these different regimes [16][17][18][19][20][21]. However, experimental values, such as I c and the parameters in the long diffusive junction, have fallen short of theoretical expectations due to impurity doping.…”
Section: Graphene-based Josephson Junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we propose using the graphene-based superconducting-normal-superconducting (SNS) Josephson junction (JJ) as a threshold sensor to detect single photons across an extremely wide spectrum. Since the first observation of the superconducting proximity effect in graphene [15], many advances have been made in the fabrication and performance of graphene-based JJs (GJJs) [16][17][18][19][20][21]. To emphasize feasibility with existing materials and fabrication technologies, we use measured parameters from a GJJ to calculate the performance of our proposed SPD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphene bilayers are attractive in this regard because their microscopic properties can be tuned by a perpendicular electric field to unbalance the two layers or to control symmetries, 23, 30-33, 48, 49 and because (as seen in this experiment) accessing the ν = -1/2 state is possible at relatively high temperature (~ 0.5 K). Another aspect is the possibility to access the 2DES in bilayer graphene readily with different kinds of contacts, including superconducting 50 and ferromagnetic ones, 51 and with scanning probes, 27,28,44 all of which can be used to investigate the nature of this even-denominator state in new ways. Our work therefore opens the path to unprecedented studies of even-denominator fractional quantum Hall effect, and raises the exciting possibility to use bilayer graphene as a suitable experimental platform for studying the physics of non-Abelian excitations.…”
Section: Landau Level (With Different Spin/valley Quantum Numbers Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be extremely useful to have further insights on the electrodynamic response and the nature of dissipation of GJJs, which need to be considered in the actual rush of more performing devices in the ballistic limit, to exploit the unique properties of Andreev reflection in graphene. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] In Section II we report on the preparation of the sample. A consistent interpretation of the phenomenology described in Sections III-V requires frames which go bearXiv:1609.05499v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 18 Sep 2016 yond the usual Josephson S/N/S paradigm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%