Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design

Abstract

Abstract:We examine how and why elements of organizational design depend on one another. An agent-based simulation allows us to model three design elements and two contextual variables that have rarely been analyzed jointly: a vertical hierarchy that reviews proposals from subordinates, an incentive system that rewards subordinates for departmental or firm-wide performance, the decomposition of an organization's many decisions into departments, the underlying pattern of interactions among decisions, and limits on the ability of managers to process information. Interdependencies arise among these features because of a basic, general tension. To be successful, an organization must search broadly for good sets of decisions , but it must also stabilize around good decisions once discovered. An effective organization balances search and stability. We identify sets of design elements that encourage broad search and others that promote stability. The adoption of elements that encourage broad search typically raises the marginal benefit of other elements that provide offsetting stability. Hence, the need to balance search and stability generates interdependencies among the design elements. We pay special attention to interdependencies that involve the vertical hierarchy. Our findings confirm many aspects of conventional wisdom about vertical hierarchies, but put boundary conditions on others. We place limits, for instance, on the received wisdom that firm-wide incentives and capable subordinates make top-level oversight less valuable. We also identify circumstances in which vertical hierarchies can lead to inferior long-term performance.1

Two Faces of Search: Alternative Generation and Alternative Evaluation

“…Another important gap in our formal models of search is that the work tends to be remarkably non-organizational, though see March (1991), Lin and Carley (1997), and Rivkin and Siggelkow (2003) for important exceptions. While the label of organizations may be invoked, often times the formal structure corresponds to a model of individuallevel problem solving.…”

The Value of Moderate Obsession: Insights from a New Model of Organizational Search

“…Recent years have seen the emergence of a substantial body of theoretical work that makes powerful use of the metaphor of search on a rugged landscape as a way to think about organizational decisions (Levinthal 1997, McKelvey 1999, Gavetti and Levinthal 2000, Fleming and Sorenson 2001, Rivkin 2001, Siggelkow 2001, Rivkin and Siggelkow 2003, Zenger and Nickerson 2004. The modeling approach in this literature builds directly on the NK model developed by biologist Stuart Kauffman (1993).…”

Coping with uncertainties via resilient supply chain framework

“…Kauffman proposed a stochastic procedure to design fitness landscapes, which argues that a landscape can be more or less rugged depending on the distribution of fitness values and interdependences among the parts -the more complex a system, the more rugged the landscape. Kauffman's concepts have been applied in modelling organisational decision problems (Levinthal, 1997;McKelvey, 1999;Gavetti and Levinthal, 2000;Rivkin, 2000Rivkin, , 2001, new product development (Frenken, 2001), organisational design (Levinthal and Warglien, 1999;Rivkin and Siggelkow, 2003), strategic analysis (Gavetti et al, 2005), industrial collaboration (Schuh et al, 2008), supply chain management (Choi et al, 2001;Choi and Krause, 2006) and sustainable supply chains (Matos and Hall, 2007;Hall et al, 2012). …”