2007
DOI: 10.1353/bhm.2007.0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing Individual and Communal Needs: Plague and Public Health in Early Modern Seville

Abstract: This article offers a reexamination of the impact of bubonic plague epidemics, using sixteenth-century Seville as a case study. It argues that municipal health officials did not simply shut down the city in times of plague, but successfully negotiated a balance between medical concerns and economic interests. While officials enacted a traditional regimen of public health measures, such as travel bans and quarantines, they also maintained open lines of communication with residents and continually allowed indivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a correlation between the air traffic and the distribution of COVID-19 was calculated using the least square regression line. The total numbers concerning the passenger throughput in percent for each economic region was (37.2 x10 7 West, 67.3 x10 7 East, 7.9 x10 7 Northeast and 14 x10 7 Central.) The passenger throughput for each region and the corresponding COVID-19 cases were demonstrated before (figure 3 A) and 13 days after (figure 3 B) lockdown.…”
Section: Outcome Measures and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a correlation between the air traffic and the distribution of COVID-19 was calculated using the least square regression line. The total numbers concerning the passenger throughput in percent for each economic region was (37.2 x10 7 West, 67.3 x10 7 East, 7.9 x10 7 Northeast and 14 x10 7 Central.) The passenger throughput for each region and the corresponding COVID-19 cases were demonstrated before (figure 3 A) and 13 days after (figure 3 B) lockdown.…”
Section: Outcome Measures and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, Wilder‐Smith et al 4 describe these different concepts in detail, ranging from the quarantine of confirmed and possibly infected individuals as implemented in Germany to the declaration of lockdown in Italy, France, and Spain with individual variations. We know from retrospective analysis that travel restrictions can positively impact case development, as observed in past SARS or Ebola outbreaks 5‐7 . China's approach in the COVID‐19 outbreak exceeds the classic definition of local confinement, lockdown, and isolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On January 31, 2020, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, with its epicenter in Wuhan, was declared a public health emergency of international concern by the WHO 2 . Considering that the disease is highly contagious and in order to prevent the further spread of COVID-19 from its source, all transport to and from Wuhan city was prohibited from 10:00h on 23 January 2020, followed by the entire Hubei Province a day later, which has been proved to be effective and was estimated to have stopped at least 700,000 cases of COVID-19 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%