2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing benefits and risks for cystic fibrosis newborn screening: implications for policy decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In some instances, ambiguous diagnostic-test results may be caused by the presence of a "variant" of CF that places the family in a prolonged period of diagnostic uncertainty without a clear compensating benefit attributable to the screen or the evaluation. 60,67,68 Ultimately, some of these infants may show classic signs of CF, some may never express disease, and some may develop mild phenotypes (eg, isolated congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens) so that the interventions prompted by CF NBS might have limited clinical value. Debate continues on the appropriateness of identifying, labeling, following up, or treating infants in the absence of a clear understanding of the prognosis of their particular disorder.…”
Section: Diagnostic Dilemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some instances, ambiguous diagnostic-test results may be caused by the presence of a "variant" of CF that places the family in a prolonged period of diagnostic uncertainty without a clear compensating benefit attributable to the screen or the evaluation. 60,67,68 Ultimately, some of these infants may show classic signs of CF, some may never express disease, and some may develop mild phenotypes (eg, isolated congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens) so that the interventions prompted by CF NBS might have limited clinical value. Debate continues on the appropriateness of identifying, labeling, following up, or treating infants in the absence of a clear understanding of the prognosis of their particular disorder.…”
Section: Diagnostic Dilemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sans verser dans un futurisme qui considère-rait comme inéluctable un profilage génétique redouté ou annoncé [6], ce déve-loppement nous incite à en étudier les enjeux sociaux et politiques. Parmi ces dépistages, celui qui concerne la mucoviscidose offre une matière particulièrement riche pour le chercheur en sciences sociales, car il a alimenté (et alimente encore) un débat dans l'arène biomédicale internationale [7][8][9]. Une première exploration de la bibliographique a révélé que le débat était triple : le dépistage néonatal de la mucoviscidose (DNM) apportait-il des bénéfices suffisants par rapport aux inconvénients ?…”
Section: Joëlle Vaillyunclassified
“…The application of these criteria to other disorders with less evidence of overwhelming immediate benefit poses challenges. Alternative frameworks for evaluating the balance of benefits and risks and approaches to screening that mitigate the risks might need to be considered for disorders such as CF (14).…”
Section: Mmwrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of previous experience with genetic screening programs (1,126,127), certain psychosocial risks were anticipated, notably parental anxiety and disturbance of the parent-child bond. These risks are related to the communication process and the experience of families being informed about screening results (14). Appropriate resources for diagnostic evaluations, treatment for infants with CF, and counseling for families might help mitigate these risks (128)(129)(130).…”
Section: Evidence For Risks Of Harmmentioning
confidence: 99%