2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmm.2011.2172591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing Attended and Global Stimuli in Perceived Video Quality Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[43][44][45][46][47] There are also mechanisms available that can objectively estimate the ROI. [48][49][50][51][52] It is therefore already possible to implement the functionality that would optimize the encryption of different regions of images while predicting how it will affect the overall quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46][47] There are also mechanisms available that can objectively estimate the ROI. [48][49][50][51][52] It is therefore already possible to implement the functionality that would optimize the encryption of different regions of images while predicting how it will affect the overall quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal nature of video Many video quality metrics account for the temporal nature of video by using pooling approaches as the Minkowski summation [21,58,183,343,349,353,354] or percentile pooling [27,116,190], while others include frames in a small interval around the current frame into the prediction [21,183,282] or use the differences to the preceding frame in the prediction [78,212,224,227,228,232,277,341,370,373]. Only a small subset of all metrics consider the temporal dimension of video without any significant temporal pooling or at least consider a relatively large interval of a few seconds [11,135,172,203,220,332].…”
Section: Motivation and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation of visual quality metrics is mostly limited to a single data set and only a small number of quality metrics are validated with multiple datasets [218,232,279,302,340,373], but none of the video quality metrics are.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown that 40 visual artifacts are likely more annoying in a salient region attended by viewers than those in other areas by Ninassi et al [10]. You et al [11] proposed a quality metric based on balancing the influence of the entire visual stimuli and attended stimuli on the perceived video quality. Video compression can also exploit different visual sensitivity of humans for attended and unattended regions, which is referred to as perceptual 45 video compression [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%