2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bait-lamina test for assessment of polluted soils: Rough vs. Precise scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This midden‐based deployment strategy probably explains the sensitivity of this approach, formally recognizing L. terrestris redistribution of plant debris (and slug pellets) through nocturnal foraging activities, which results in highly localized hotspots. The two‐point scale for bait consumption is biased towards earthworm activities because they are large, mobile invertebrates, which can consume 80–300 mg/g/day in food (Edwards & Bohlen, 1996) and more likely to consume >50% bait (Vorobeichik & Bergman, 2021). There is no evidence that pest species of slug ( Deroceras reticulatum) consumed the bait‐lamina, no slugs were observed during field sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This midden‐based deployment strategy probably explains the sensitivity of this approach, formally recognizing L. terrestris redistribution of plant debris (and slug pellets) through nocturnal foraging activities, which results in highly localized hotspots. The two‐point scale for bait consumption is biased towards earthworm activities because they are large, mobile invertebrates, which can consume 80–300 mg/g/day in food (Edwards & Bohlen, 1996) and more likely to consume >50% bait (Vorobeichik & Bergman, 2021). There is no evidence that pest species of slug ( Deroceras reticulatum) consumed the bait‐lamina, no slugs were observed during field sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bait-lamina test was performed at the peak of the growing season, in May. Bait-lamina test is a simple and common in-situ indicator of feeding activity of soil fauna (Von Törne, 1990), with negligible effects from soil microorganisms and abiotic decay (Hamel et al, 2007;Klimek et al, 2015;Vorobeichik & Bergman, 2021). Plastic strips of 120 Â 6 Â 1 mm, with 16 bi-conical apertures 1 mm in diameter arranged every 6 mm were used.…”
Section: In-situ Measurements Of Feeding Activity Of Soil Faunamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five test areas were set up for each treatment, and 5 strips per area were placed about 15-20 cm apart to monitor the feeding activities of soil fauna with 150 bait lamina in total. After 2 weeks of monitoring, the bait strips were taken from the soil and evaluated with filled (0), partly empty (0.5), and empty (1) (Vorobeichik and Bergman, 2021), to calculate the number of perforated bait strips at each study site and evaluate the percentage of perforated bait strips to the number of test holes in the field. In this study, soil temperature was measured using a HOBO U23-003 sensor (Onset Computer Corporation, Pocasset, MA, United States).…”
Section: Field Sampling and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%