2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3224417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bad Sovereign or Bad Balance Sheets? Euro Interbank Market Fragmentation and Monetary Policy, 2011-2015

Abstract: We measure the relative role of sovereign-dependence risk and balance sheet (credit) risk in euro area interbank market fragmentation from 2011 to 2015. We combine bankto-bank loan data with detailed supervisory information on banks' cross-border and crosssector exposures. We study the impact of the credit risk on banks' balance sheets on their access to, and the price paid for, interbank liquidity, controlling for sovereign-dependence risk and lenders' liquidity shocks. We find that (i) high non-performing lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These countries have more vulnerable banking sectors with the lowest level of capital and the highest share of nonperforming loans (see Table A1). This result is in line with evidence presented in Altavilla et al (2020), Gabrieli and Labonne (2022), and Neuenkirch and Nöckel (2018). QE…”
Section: 23supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These countries have more vulnerable banking sectors with the lowest level of capital and the highest share of nonperforming loans (see Table A1). This result is in line with evidence presented in Altavilla et al (2020), Gabrieli and Labonne (2022), and Neuenkirch and Nöckel (2018). QE…”
Section: 23supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Whereas the measures that concern lenders' behaviors (capital requirements or leverage ratios) are common to euro area countries and included in European directives (Capital requirement regulation [CRR]/capital requirement directive [CRD IV]), borrower‐based instruments (such as loans‐to‐value ratios or debt‐to‐income ratios) are left to national choices, creating heterogeneities in their implementation (Merler, 2015). The heterogeneity inside the Eurozone persists, with high levels of nonperforming loans (Table A1), insolvency (Table A3), and illiquidity risks in southern Europe (Tables A2 and A4), which limit the banks' access to the interbank market (Gabrieli & Labonne, 2022). Moreover, even if the risk associated with Eurozone sovereign and bank assets has decreased since 2013, the vicious circle between banks and sovereign risk remains (Colozza & Barucci, 2021).…”
Section: European Context and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Acharya et al (2016) show that, following the OMTs, individual banks' holdings of debt issued by stressed sovereigns have no bearing on their access to US MMF funding. In a similar vein, Gabrieli and Labonne (2018) show that before the OMTs banks were facing premia, when borrowing in the interbank market, that were related to the country in which they were based. Following the OMTs, these country-driven premia vanished and, instead, it is individual banks' balance sheet risk that determines the interest rate they are charged.…”
Section: Beneficial Spillovers (To Banks' Intermediation Capacity)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This assumption is based on the strong "home bias" of bank lending in the Eurozone widely documented in the empirical literature (see Acharya and Steffen 2015;Becker and Ivashina 2017;Gabrieli and Labonne 2018;Ongena et al 2018). It also reflects the doom-loop in the Eurozone à la and Farhi and Tirole (2017) that banks in the Eurozone hold a disproportionately large amount of national debt.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%