Bad News Has Wings: Dread Risk Mediates Social Amplification in Risk Communication

Abstract

Social diffusion of information amplifies risk through processes of birth, death, and distortion of message content. Dread risk-involving uncontrollable, fatal, involuntary, and catastrophic outcomes (e.g., terrorist attacks and nuclear accidents)-may be particularly susceptible to amplification because of the psychological biases inherent in dread risk avoidance. To test this, initially balanced information about high or low dread topics was given to a set of individuals who then communicated this information through diffusion chains, each person passing a message to the next. A subset of these chains were also reexposed to the original information. We measured prior knowledge, perceived risk before and after transmission, and, at each link, number of positive and negative statements. Results showed that the more a message was transmitted the more negative statements it contained. This was highest for the high dread topic. Increased perceived risk and production of negative messages was closely related to the amount of negative information that was received, with domain knowledge mitigating this effect. Reexposure to the initial information was ineffectual in reducing bias, demonstrating the enhanced danger of socially transmitted information.

Americans’ Views of Voluntary Protective Actions Against Zika Infection: Conceptual and Measurement Issues

“…Interpreting near‐misses as disasters that almost happened can increase judged risk and willingness to enact risk‐reduction behavior (Dillon, Tinsley, & Burns, ; Tinsley, Dillon, & Cronin, ). Dread was an element in one of two underlying dimensions (the other being knowledge) in the psychometric approach to perceived risk (Slovic, ), and drives an affect heuristic (Slovic & Peters, ) that can increase transmission of negative messages in social networks (Jagiello & Hills, ). Likelihood is another occasional measure of risk perception (Wilson et al., ).…”

A Brief History of Risk

“…In this environment, information that is better at being received, remembered, 506 and reproduced has a selective advantage (Hills, 2019). Though this mechanism applies to all 507 information, it may be especially true of prominent risks, which may self-reinforce their negativity more 508 rapidly via enhanced social communication (Jagiello & Hills, 2018).…”

Risk Analysis: Celebrating the Accomplishments and Embracing Ongoing Challenges

“…Without longitudinal studies, this will be difficult, which implies the need to continue to be openminded about the relationship between perceptions of climate change, trust, and risk mitigation options. Indeed, it is fair to observe that the last decade has produced risk perception and communication research that led to counterintuitive findings that should be considered by decisionmakers (Dillon, Tinsley, & Cronin, 2011;Jagiello & Hills, 2018;Jensen et al, 2017;Suzuki, 2014).…”