2016
DOI: 10.4103/2278-344x.194083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteriological profile and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bloodstream infections in a tertiary care hospital, Eastern India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Klebsiella species (19%) which is in accordance to Vatkar et al13 and Dash et al12 CoNS being the most common contaminant, 2 sets of blood culture from different sites were taken or clinically correlated positive samples were considered clinically significant. Klebsiella was the most common Gram negative bacilli isolated which was in accordance to Parihar et al4 and Dash et al 12 while in discordance to Vasudev et al 11 and Gupta et al 7 where E. coli was the most common organism isolated.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Klebsiella species (19%) which is in accordance to Vatkar et al13 and Dash et al12 CoNS being the most common contaminant, 2 sets of blood culture from different sites were taken or clinically correlated positive samples were considered clinically significant. Klebsiella was the most common Gram negative bacilli isolated which was in accordance to Parihar et al4 and Dash et al 12 while in discordance to Vasudev et al 11 and Gupta et al 7 where E. coli was the most common organism isolated.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Similar results were observed by Katyal et al, 7 Banik et al, 13 and Orsini et al 1 However, many national and international studies have reported a higher incidence of GNB than GPC as the causative organism of bloodstream infections. 8,9,14 Among the Gram-positive pathogens, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly observed isolate, followed by Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus sp. This finding supports those in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding supports those in the literature. 5,7,9 CONS has been considered the most common blood contaminant; however, the clinical significance of CONS was defined as at least two blood cultures positive for CONS within 5 days or one positive blood culture plus clinical evidence of infection, which comprise an abnormal leukocyte count and body temperature. 18 Improper techniques of blood collection and the presence of longstanding intravascular devices are recognized possible causes of BSIs by CONS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations