The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.5978/islsm.14-or-20
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bactericidal effect of visible light in the presence of erythrosine on Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum compared with diode laser, an in vitro study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Song et al 33 compared the antimicrobial effects of blue light on periodontal pathogens in planktonic and biofilm conditions and noted that exposure to blue light for periodontal bacteria in the biofilm state is less effective than exposure in planktonic conditions. Habiboallah et al 34 studied the photodynamic sterilizing effect of visible light in the presence of erythrosine, a photosensitizer for gram-negative bacteria, and found that visible blue LED light (440 -480 nm, 570 mW) in conjugation with erythrosine significantly reduced bacterial viability. Thus, PDT alone may have limitations in the removal of bacteria and requires additional mechanical methods and photosensitizers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song et al 33 compared the antimicrobial effects of blue light on periodontal pathogens in planktonic and biofilm conditions and noted that exposure to blue light for periodontal bacteria in the biofilm state is less effective than exposure in planktonic conditions. Habiboallah et al 34 studied the photodynamic sterilizing effect of visible light in the presence of erythrosine, a photosensitizer for gram-negative bacteria, and found that visible blue LED light (440 -480 nm, 570 mW) in conjugation with erythrosine significantly reduced bacterial viability. Thus, PDT alone may have limitations in the removal of bacteria and requires additional mechanical methods and photosensitizers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown in several scientific studies that the blue part of the visible spectrum (400-500 nm) is responsible for the suppression of various pathogens [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Antiviral Properties Of Curcumin and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habiboallah et al [35] investigated the periodontal bactericidal effect on P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum using erythrosine and an LED (440-480 nm) compared with a diode laser (800 nm). Those authors concluded that erythrosine at 22 µM in the presence of a blue light and infrared diode laser could be considered as a potential approach of PDI against Gram-negative periodontal pathogenic species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those authors concluded that erythrosine at 22 µM in the presence of a blue light and infrared diode laser could be considered as a potential approach of PDI against Gram-negative periodontal pathogenic species. Nagata et al [36], in a review of PDI for dental caries, reported that erythrosine is the most hydrophilic photosensitizer and the Gram-positive bacteria allow better penetration of this dye, but Habiboallah et al [35] and Silva et al [37] showed good results with Gram-negative bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%