1995
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199509000-00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bactericidal Activity of Skin Disinfectants on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This evidence included the significant decrease in overall contamination rates during the study compared to the baseline period, the significantly lower contamination rate for the combined alcohol-containing antiseptic groups compared to the combined PI groups (baseline period and PI study arm), and the absence of a significant difference between contamination rates when PI was used during the study and baseline periods despite significant differences between the baseline PI contamination rate and the rates observed for IPA and Persist. The apparent benefit of alcohol-containing antiseptics was likely due to their more rapid antimicrobial activity compared to iodophors (4,5,13 3% with PI and alcohol, respectively (P ϭ 0.39). The ability of that study to detect a significant difference between the two antiseptics was limited by a small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evidence included the significant decrease in overall contamination rates during the study compared to the baseline period, the significantly lower contamination rate for the combined alcohol-containing antiseptic groups compared to the combined PI groups (baseline period and PI study arm), and the absence of a significant difference between contamination rates when PI was used during the study and baseline periods despite significant differences between the baseline PI contamination rate and the rates observed for IPA and Persist. The apparent benefit of alcohol-containing antiseptics was likely due to their more rapid antimicrobial activity compared to iodophors (4,5,13 3% with PI and alcohol, respectively (P ϭ 0.39). The ability of that study to detect a significant difference between the two antiseptics was limited by a small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alcohols have excellent in vitro germicidal activity against gram-positive and gram-negative vegetative bacteria, including multidrug-resistant pathogens (e.g., MRSA and VRE), Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and various fungi (120)(121)(122)(124)(125)(126)(127)(128)(129). Certain enveloped (lipophilic) viruses (e.g., herpes simplex virus, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, and vaccinia virus) are susceptible to alcohols when tested in vitro (120,130,131) (Table 1).…”
Section: Alcoholsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may affect the susceptibility of the tooth to acid attack. Povidone-iodine has been shown to be effective against most bacteria [Ivanovski et al, 1995;Sakuragi et al, 1995], fungi [White-Weithers and Medleau, 1995], viruses [Shimakoshi et al, 1995] as well as spores [Ross and Holbrook, 1984], but the effect of this chemical on enamel integrity is not known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%