1983
DOI: 10.2166/wqrj.1983.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Leaching of Heavy Metals From Anaerobically Digested Sewage Sludge

Abstract: Spreading of sewage sludges on agricultural land is an attractive sludge management option because it combines beneficial reuse and disposal at the same time. However, it is important to reduce the metal content in the sludge in order to minimize the health hazard associated with metal uptake by plants and its subsequent accumulation in the food chain. Treatment of sludge with acid for metal removal is not practical because a large amount of acid is required. Typically 0.5 to 0.8 g of H2SO4/g dry weight of slu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 30% solubilization was achieved in the acid-leaching reactor even after 4 days. The results are comparable with Ni solubilization data, 70% solubilization of Ni after 8 days, obtained from anaerobically digested sewage sludge by Wong and Henry (1983). However, Blais et al (1992b) observed only 40% Ni solubilization from municipal sludge with an iron-oxidizing mixed culture during 10 days of microbial leaching.…”
Section: Comparison Between Bioleaching and Acid Leachingsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only 30% solubilization was achieved in the acid-leaching reactor even after 4 days. The results are comparable with Ni solubilization data, 70% solubilization of Ni after 8 days, obtained from anaerobically digested sewage sludge by Wong and Henry (1983). However, Blais et al (1992b) observed only 40% Ni solubilization from municipal sludge with an iron-oxidizing mixed culture during 10 days of microbial leaching.…”
Section: Comparison Between Bioleaching and Acid Leachingsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, Blais et al (1992b) observed only 40% Ni solubilization from municipal sludge with an iron-oxidizing mixed culture during 10 days of microbial leaching. Both Wong and Henry (1983) and Blais et al (1992b) reported significantly higher cadmium solubilization (80%) than Ni solubilization from the same sludge samples. Mercier et al (1996) reported that microbial leaching processes were capable of solubilizing 80% Cd, 73% Cu, and 90% Cu from heavily contaminated sediments.…”
Section: Comparison Between Bioleaching and Acid Leachingmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported that total content of metals in sewage sludge was about 0.5-4% (on a dry weight basis) [5]. However, heavy metals associated with different fractions had different impacts on the environment [6] and their phytotoxicity would connect to some forms rather than the total concentration of metals [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many efforts to recover valuable elements from industrial wastes and to decrease potential risk of environmental contamination. One of the recently applied methods is bioleaching (the solubilization of metals from solid substrates either directly by the metabolism of leaching bacteria or indirectly by the products of their metabolism [4]) Bioleaching is a simple, economical and effective process for metal solubilization from industrial wastes or biosolids [1][2][3]. Metal solubilization from solid wastes or other solids is achieved through the activity of some chemolithotrophic bacteria for example autotrophic or heterotrophic bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%