2016
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9: Deletion, Integration, Single Nucleotide Modification, and Desirable “Clean” Mutant Selection in Clostridium beijerinckii as an Example

Abstract: CRISPR-Cas9 has been demonstrated as a transformative genome engineering tool for many eukaryotic organisms; however, its utilization in bacteria remains limited and ineffective. Here we explored Streptococcus pyogenes CRISPR-Cas9 for genome editing in Clostridium beijerinckii (industrially significant but notorious for being difficult to metabolically engineer) as a representative attempt to explore CRISPR-Cas9 for genome editing in microorganisms that previously lacked sufficient genetic tools. By combining … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
148
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(94 reference statements)
2
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, the CRISPR-Cas9 system has been applied in very few bacterial species to edit their genomes (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)). An example is the two-plasmid-based system constructed for engineering Escherichia coli (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the CRISPR-Cas9 system has been applied in very few bacterial species to edit their genomes (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)). An example is the two-plasmid-based system constructed for engineering Escherichia coli (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, through employing a second sgRNA that recognizes the introduced artificial protospacer sequence, the target sites will be mutated, and meanwhile the artificial PAM or protospacer sequence will be back-mutated to its original sequence, generating a clean mutant with only the target sites mutated (Biot-Pelletier and Martin, 2016). Wang et al (2016) reported a similar approach. The PAM or protospacer used in the first step was modified or deleted, whereas the artificial PAM was created at the target site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Recent advances in the genetic manipulation of clostridia (primarily C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 and C. beijerinckii NCIMB 8052) have afforded several methods for targeted gene disruption, including (i) heterologous expression of mobile group II introns with the ClosTron system (36), (ii) allelic exchange via homologous recombination (37,38), and very recently, (iii) clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat(s) (CRISPR)-Cas9 genome editing (39)(40)(41). Given the observed instability and off-target effects associated with mobile group II introns (42) as well as the start-up time required to adapt an efficient CRISPR-Cas9 system for use in C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4, we chose here to pursue a double-crossover-based allelic exchange (DCAE) method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study serves as a foundation for future metabolic engineering efforts of this prominent solvent producer to not only improve fermentation performance metrics (e.g., solvent titers, productivities, and yields, oxygen tolerance, substrate specificity, cell viability), but also to serve as a platform for the production of other high-value products (e.g., higher alcohols and petrochemical precursors). Additionally, this study opens the door for advanced genetic manipulations of this organism using recent achievements in adapting CRISPR/Cas9 systems for use in clostridia (40,41). Before this is possible, future studies are required to identify additional promoters, antibiotic markers, and counterselection methods able to function in C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%