2017
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel and Efficient Method for Bacteria Genome Editing Employing both CRISPR/Cas9 and an Antibiotic Resistance Cassette

Abstract: As Cas9-mediated cleavage requires both protospacer and protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences, it is impossible to employ the CRISPR/Cas9 system to directly edit genomic sites without available PAM sequences nearby. Here, we optimized the CRISPR/Cas9 system and developed an innovative two-step strategy for efficient genome editing of any sites, which did not rely on the availability of PAM sequences. An antibiotic resistance cassette was employed as both a positive and a negative selection marker. By inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been exploited for a broad range of bacteria and algae. Examples include Escherichia coli , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Bacillus subtilis , B. smithii , Streptomyces spp., Lactobacillus reuteri , L. casei , Clostridium beijerinckii , C. ljungdahlii , C. acetobutylicum , C. cellulolyticum , Pseudomonas putida , Synechococcus elongatus , Actinoplanes sp., Corynebacterium glutamicum , Staphylococcus aureus , and Myxococcus xanthus . These reports have demonstrated that the CRISPR/Cas9 system enables the easy and efficient establishment of point mutations, indels, gene replacements, large gene integrations, and large chromosomal deletions at target genomic loci.…”
Section: Application Of the Crispr/cas System For Microbial Metabolicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been exploited for a broad range of bacteria and algae. Examples include Escherichia coli , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Bacillus subtilis , B. smithii , Streptomyces spp., Lactobacillus reuteri , L. casei , Clostridium beijerinckii , C. ljungdahlii , C. acetobutylicum , C. cellulolyticum , Pseudomonas putida , Synechococcus elongatus , Actinoplanes sp., Corynebacterium glutamicum , Staphylococcus aureus , and Myxococcus xanthus . These reports have demonstrated that the CRISPR/Cas9 system enables the easy and efficient establishment of point mutations, indels, gene replacements, large gene integrations, and large chromosomal deletions at target genomic loci.…”
Section: Application Of the Crispr/cas System For Microbial Metabolicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies proposed CRISPR-Cas systems for controlling antibiotic-resistant strains. 5,17,36,40 Therefore, in this review article, we aimed to review the role of the CRISPR-Cas system to promote sensitization of bacteria against antibiotics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRISPR-Cas systems have been identified as a bacterial adaptive immune system 41 and as analogs of the mammalian immune system. 42 In the recent studies, the CRISPR-Cas system has been used for specific genome editing and different applications including treating genetic diseases, 43 genome engineering of various bacteria, 44 plants, 45 mice, 46 flies, 47 worms, 48 and more, and reversal of antibiotic resistance by targeting resistance genes, 5,17,40 as well as integration machinery of the systems, has been used to function as a molecular recording device. 49 This interesting system is found in approximately 50% of bacterial genomes and 87% of archaeal genomes.…”
Section: Introducing Crispr-casmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing methods, CRISPR/Cas9-assisted recombineering methods perform very well. Existing CRISPR/Cas9-assisted recombineering methods use cycle DNA (plasmid-borne dsDNA) [24][25][26] or linear DNA (PCR-amplified dsDNA or synthesized ssDNA) [23,24,[27][28][29] as the editing template, and both kinds of templates have advantages and disadvantages. The cycle editing template can avoid the attack by DNA exonucleases and copy itself along with the plasmid replication, thus resulting in much higher homologous recombination efficiency and editing efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%