1962
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1962.tb04131.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Ear Conditions in the Dog and Their Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mild cases are not always detected by the owner, and consequently the dog is not presented for aural treatment. This is particularly so in breeds with a mild temperament (Cross 1962).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mild cases are not always detected by the owner, and consequently the dog is not presented for aural treatment. This is particularly so in breeds with a mild temperament (Cross 1962).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, amphotericin B and nystatine seem to be less effective compounds in the treatment of fungal canine otitis. Some authors have found nystatine to be an effective compound against fungi (CROSS, 1962;HARVEY, 1980), especially Candida (STUDDERT andHUGHES 1991). Maybe its general use in commercial preparations has resulted in increasing the number of resistant strains; the same explanation could be applied to amphotericin B.…”
Section: Antfungal Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%