2012
DOI: 10.1139/w2012-038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial contamination of tile drainage water and shallow groundwater under different application methods of liquid swine manure

Abstract: A 2 year field experiment evaluated liquid manure application methods on the movement of manure-borne pathogens (Salmonella sp.) and indicator bacteria (Escherichia coli and Clostridium perfringens) to subsurface water. A combination of application methods including surface application, pre-application tillage, and post-application incorporation were applied in a randomized complete block design on an instrumented field site in spring 2007 and 2008. Tile and shallow groundwater were sampled immediately after m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study are consistent with previous studies which report increased concentrations of bacteria in tiles lines under NT plots when compared to tilled plots (Pappas et al, 2008;Samarajeewa et al, 2012;Hoang et al, 2013). However, bacteria concentrations observed in tile-waters below NT plots with PM2 treatment in this study were substantially higher than previously reported from swine manure amended plots (Garder et al, 2014).…”
Section: Effects Of Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of this study are consistent with previous studies which report increased concentrations of bacteria in tiles lines under NT plots when compared to tilled plots (Pappas et al, 2008;Samarajeewa et al, 2012;Hoang et al, 2013). However, bacteria concentrations observed in tile-waters below NT plots with PM2 treatment in this study were substantially higher than previously reported from swine manure amended plots (Garder et al, 2014).…”
Section: Effects Of Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Previous studies report increased concentrations of manure-derived bacteria in tiles lines under NT plots when compared to tilled plots (Pappas et al, 2008;Samarajeewa et al, 2012;Hoang et al, 2013). All three studies hypothesized that increased macroporosity in NT plots was the cause of these differences; however, it is important to consider other possible explanations for these differences.…”
Section: Effects Of Tillagementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, various common agricultural practices, such as storage practices, method of application, timing of application, and tillage practices, have been shown to impact bacterial survival and must be considered (Hutchison et al 2004b;Arrus et al 2006;Coelho et al 2007;Semenov et al 2009;Samarajeewa et al 2012;Amin et al 2013;Hoang et al 2013). While numerous studies have documented persistence of SALM, and other pathogens in soils amended with swine and bovine manures, fewer have evaluated bacterial survival on artificially drained glacial till-derived soils (Gessel et al 2004;Rogers et al 2011;Samarajeewa et al 2012;Hoang et al 2013;Garder et al 2014). Islam et al (2004) observed longer survival times of SALM in soils amended with composted PM in comparison to composts from other manure sources; however, studies of untreated PM are rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidentally, animal manures have been identified as a leading cause of pathogen contamination of streams and rivers in United States (Soupir et al 2006). For example, Samarajeewa et al (2012) found E. coli and C. perfringens in shallow groundwater and tile drainage water samples within 3-10 days of applying swine manure to loamy soil in southern Ontario. The practice of injecting manure into the soil as a mean to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient losses may increase survival times of pathogens after manure application (Hodgson et al 2016).…”
Section: Agronomic Aspects: Nutrient Contents and Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%