2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial biomass and activity in the marginal ice zone of the northern Barents Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
9
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the open part of the Arctic Ocean and the Canadian Arctic, the quantitative estimates for bacterial plankton were still lower: their number was not higher than 670000 cells/ml and the biomass did not exceed 13 mg C/m 3 [6,14]. It was previously reported for the Barents Sea that the abundance of bacteria tended to decrease from the south to the north [2], this observation, however, has not been confirmed by an analysis of published works [9,14,15,17] and our data. The irregular distribution of bacteria in the Arctic regions considered (Greenland and Barents Sea, Canadian Arctic and Arctic Ocean) can be attrib uted not only to differences in ambient conditions, but also to methods of sampling: water samples were taken in the deep sea regions from greater depths [6,14], which could lead to relatively low values for the num ber of microorganisms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the open part of the Arctic Ocean and the Canadian Arctic, the quantitative estimates for bacterial plankton were still lower: their number was not higher than 670000 cells/ml and the biomass did not exceed 13 mg C/m 3 [6,14]. It was previously reported for the Barents Sea that the abundance of bacteria tended to decrease from the south to the north [2], this observation, however, has not been confirmed by an analysis of published works [9,14,15,17] and our data. The irregular distribution of bacteria in the Arctic regions considered (Greenland and Barents Sea, Canadian Arctic and Arctic Ocean) can be attrib uted not only to differences in ambient conditions, but also to methods of sampling: water samples were taken in the deep sea regions from greater depths [6,14], which could lead to relatively low values for the num ber of microorganisms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In the waters of Western Spitsbergen Is., the biomass of bacterial plankton was comparable to that observed in the northwestern areas of the Barents Sea and adjoining waters of the Arctic Ocean. In particular, in the sum mers of 2003-2004, the biomass of bacteria in these areas ranged from 8.6 to 30.9 mg C/m 3 [15], which gives an average value of 16 µg C/m 3 [15] (the average estimate was calculated by the authors of this article). The last estimate is slightly higher than in our study (see table).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial solubilisation of sinking particles directly impacts the composition and magnitude of the vertically ex ported material, but investigations of the metabolic activity of bacteria in sediment traps are scarce and reveal conflicting results from comparable marine environments. While Huston & Deming (2002) found higher cell-specific hydrolytic enzyme activity and a higher proportion of actively respiring bacteria in sediment trap samples from the Baffin Bay, Tammert et al (2008) found an equal contribution of actively respiring bacteria in sediment traps and ambient water samples in the Barents Sea. The community composition and source of total bacteria associated with sinking material as well as the temporal and geographical variation in the composition and activity of these communities largely remains unknown, and knowledge of how bacteria impact the biological carbon pump is therefore incomplete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For the measurements of distributions and the diversity of bacterial communities, 16S rRNA-DGGE can directly reflect the diversity of bacterial species and dominant groups as well as some specific bacteria (Ye et al 2009;Leloup et al 2009). Therefore, the combination of these methods has been successfully used to reveal the intrinsic bacterial communities in various sediments (Xu and Leff 2004;Tammert et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%