2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteria responsive antibacterial surfaces for indwelling device infections

Abstract: Indwelling device infections now represents life-threatening circumstances as a result of the biofilms’ tolerance to antibiotic treatments. Current antibiotic impregnation approaches through sustained antibiotic release have some unsolved problems which include short life-span, narrowed antibacterial spectrum, ineffectiveness towards resistant mutants, and the potential to hasten the antibiotic resistance process. In this study, bacteria responsive anti-biofilm surfaces were developed using bioactive peptides … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the MTT assay, biofilms were incubated with MTT at 37°C for 30 min. After washing, the purple formazan formed inside the bacterial cells was dissolved by SDS and then measured using a microplate reader by setting the detecting and reference wavelengths at 570 and 630 nm respectively (Traba and Liang ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MTT assay, biofilms were incubated with MTT at 37°C for 30 min. After washing, the purple formazan formed inside the bacterial cells was dissolved by SDS and then measured using a microplate reader by setting the detecting and reference wavelengths at 570 and 630 nm respectively (Traba and Liang ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traba et al. developed responsive antibacterial surfaces by coating polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with lytic peptides because they demonstrated good antibacterial properties . A surface coating using this material showed excellent antibacterial and antibiofilm activity compared with an unmodified surface.…”
Section: Targeting Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface of medical devices can be easily modified with poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) by use of either plasma polymerization or gamma-ray grafting approaches; PAA-grafted chains act as intermediates for binding cationic drugs through strong ionic interactions (Mendes, 2008;Alvarez-Lorenzo et al, 2010). Remarkably, changes in pH in the typical range of microorganism growth may reverse the affinity and thus trigger the release of the drug, as demonstrated for vancomycin and antimicrobial peptides (Ruiz et al, 2008;Muñoz-Muñoz et al, 2012;García-Vargas et al, 2014;Traba and Liang, 2015). In case of the lytic peptide agents, their direct transfer from the device to the bacteria membrane and the increase in their activity as the pH decreases strongly contributes to the inhibition of biofilm formation (Traba and Liang, 2015).…”
Section: Drug-eluting Medical Device Example Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, changes in pH in the typical range of microorganism growth may reverse the affinity and thus trigger the release of the drug, as demonstrated for vancomycin and antimicrobial peptides (Ruiz et al, 2008;Muñoz-Muñoz et al, 2012;García-Vargas et al, 2014;Traba and Liang, 2015). In case of the lytic peptide agents, their direct transfer from the device to the bacteria membrane and the increase in their activity as the pH decreases strongly contributes to the inhibition of biofilm formation (Traba and Liang, 2015).…”
Section: Drug-eluting Medical Device Example Referencementioning
confidence: 99%