2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteria in drinking water sources of a First Nation reserve in Canada

Abstract: Approximately 20% of the 600 First Nations reserves across Canada are under a drinking water advisory, often due to unacceptable levels of bacteria. In this study, we detected fecal bacteria at an alarmingly high frequency in drinking water sources in a fly-in First Nations community, most notably in buckets/drums of homes without running water where Escherichia coli levels ranged from 20 to 62,000 CFU/100mL. The water leaving the water treatment plant was free of E. coli and its free residual chlorine concent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the World Health Organization (WHO) standard for drinking water quality is < 1 CFU E. coli /100 mL, E. coli concentrations are frequently reported within the range of 0.9–3.3 log 10 CFU/100 mL E. coli . 11 , 12 , 41 , 42 , 51 55 In our study, 70.4% of samples ( N = 100) exceed the WHO standard. Similarly, studies are increasingly highlighting E. coli contamination in the soil of 2.1–5.5 log 10 /g of soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Although the World Health Organization (WHO) standard for drinking water quality is < 1 CFU E. coli /100 mL, E. coli concentrations are frequently reported within the range of 0.9–3.3 log 10 CFU/100 mL E. coli . 11 , 12 , 41 , 42 , 51 55 In our study, 70.4% of samples ( N = 100) exceed the WHO standard. Similarly, studies are increasingly highlighting E. coli contamination in the soil of 2.1–5.5 log 10 /g of soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…First, we investigated the influence of two DNA extraction kits commonly used with DW [the PowerWater DNA Isolation Kit (PowerWater) ( Nitzsche et al, 2015 ; Farenhorst et al, 2016 ; Fernando et al, 2016 ) and the FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (FastDNA) ( Li et al, 2010 ; Huang et al, 2014 ; Belila et al, 2016 )]. Then we investigated the impact of the choice of primers by using primer-sets targeting the V1-3, V3-4, and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, which all have been used in previous DW studies ( Huang et al, 2014 ; Prest et al, 2014 ; Bautista-de los Santos et al, 2015 ; El-Chakhtoura et al, 2015 ; Gomez-Alvarez et al, 2015 ; Farenhorst et al, 2016 ; Liu et al, 2016 ). Finally, the detection limit of the employed 16S rRNA gene amplicon approach was estimated based on spike-in experiments using Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) cells in concentrations spanning 10 1 –10 6 cells/ml.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study findings, however, disagree with [23] who reported that all water samples collected from unprotected water sources had fecal coliforms (FC), and 80% of samples had fecal coliforms ranging from 0.67 to 266.67 CFU/100 ml. A related study by [24] reported high thermotolerant E. coli levels up to 62,000 CFU/100 ml in drinking water sources in Central Gonja District.…”
Section: Total Coliforms (Tc)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, some strains can cause human illness. The presence of E. coli in a drinking water sample usually is indicative of recent fecal contamination [24]. E. coli O157: H7 strain is known to cause most outbreaks [21].…”
Section: Total Coliforms (Tc)mentioning
confidence: 99%