Investigation of Detection Limits and the Influence of DNA Extraction and Primer Choice on the Observed Microbial Communities in Drinking Water Samples Using 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing

Abstract

In recent years, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing has been widely adopted for analyzing the microbial communities in drinking water (DW). However, no comprehensive attempts have been made to illuminate the inherent method biases specifically relating to DW communities. In this study, we investigated the impact of DNA extraction and primer choice on the observed microbial community, and furthermore estimated the detection limit of the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in these experimental settings. Of the two DNA extraction kits investigated, the PowerWater DNA Isolation Kit resulted in higher yield, better reproducibility and more OTUs identified compared to the FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil, which is also commonly used within DW microbiome research. The use of three separate primer-sets targeting the V1-3, V3-4, and V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene revealed large differences in OTU abundances, with some of the primers unable to detect entire phyla. Estimations of the detection limit were based on bacteria-free water samples (1 L) spiked with Escherichia coli cells in different concentrations [101–106 cells/ml]. E. coli could be detected in all samples, however, samples with ∼101 cells/ml had several contaminating OTUs constituting approximately 8% of the read abundances. Based on our findings, we recommend using the PowerWater DNA Isolation Kit for DNA extraction in combination with PCR amplification of the V3-4 or V4 region for DW samples if a broad overview of the microbial community is to be obtained.

High-Throughput 16S rRNA Sequencing to Assess Potentially Active Bacteria and Foodborne Pathogens: A Case Example in Ready-to-Eat Food

“…Here, we used a well standardized technique that has been extensively proven to be very sensitive and robust. For instance, in a recent paper in which food samples were spiked with E. coli (10 1 –10 6 cells/mL) and monitored using our PCR-based methodology applied for RTE salads (PCR of Region V3 and V4 of the 16S rRNA gene combined with Illumina Miseq sequencing), the authors demonstrated that it could be detected in all samples, as low as 101 cells/mL [41]. Another 16S rRNA-PCR-based study on Salmonella cells artificially contaminated in food samples indicated that the detection limit was N × 100 cells per assay [42].…”

Associations between fungal and bacterial microbiota of airways and asthma endotypes

“…From this, we concluded that no reagent contamination contributed to sample sequencing. 43 Of 5 brush control samples, one generated fewer than 500 reads, whereas the other 4 samples averaged 5000 reads per sample. We identified 20, 10, 18, and 12 unique ESVs in brush controls 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.…”

Proteotyping Environmental Microorganisms by Phylopeptidomics: Case Study Screening Water from a Radioactive Material Storage Pool

“…The taxonomic identification of novel isolated microorganisms is traditionally achieved by amplifying and sequencing 16S/18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes. However, the resolution of this method is limited, in particular it has difficulty discriminating between closely-related species [ 11 , 12 ], and no universal primers exist covering the whole diversity of microbial life. In addition, the process is time-consuming, making it difficult to include in a screening pipeline.…”