1986
DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(86)90033-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backward masking, IQ, SAT and reaction time: Interrelationships and theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study, however, did not find detection accuracy to be a significantly correlated to SAT scores in the presence of SES. A weak relationship between detection accuracy and SAT scores has been previously reported (Longstreth et al, 1986). Although greater detection accuracy was significantly correlated with higher SAT scores, this relationship was not significant when controlling for SES or in the context of the more powerful pupillary response predictor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study, however, did not find detection accuracy to be a significantly correlated to SAT scores in the presence of SES. A weak relationship between detection accuracy and SAT scores has been previously reported (Longstreth et al, 1986). Although greater detection accuracy was significantly correlated with higher SAT scores, this relationship was not significant when controlling for SES or in the context of the more powerful pupillary response predictor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Inspection time (IT), the amount of time needed for an individual to reliably perceive the target stimulus, has been touted as the best information-processing measure in terms of having a reliable, substantial correlation with performance on standard tests of psychometric intelligence (Deary and Stough, 1996). This measure derived from the backward masking paradigm accounts for approximately 20% of the variance in intelligence tests (Deary and Stough, 1996;Kranzler and Jensen, 1989;Longstreth et al, 1986;Nettlebeck et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been replicated in undergraduates (Longstreth et al, 1986;Mackenzie & Bingham, 1985;Mackenzie & Cumming, 1986-;Deary, l987a), in children (Anderson, 1986;Hosie, reported in Brand & Deary, 1982;Young, 1987;Deary, 1987b) and in mentally retarded groups (see Nettelbeck, 1987). IT correlates wih IQ under different experimental conditions: stimuli consisting of two, three and four lines, two lights, animal names and stimuli pictures, coloured lines, horizontal lines, alphanumeric characters and tones of different pitch have proved successful (Brand & Deary, 1982;Nettelbeck, 1987) and different psychophysical procedures such as adaptive staircases, e.g.…”
Section: Inspection Time and Intelligencementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Undergraduates were given the AIT test using the method of constant stimuli and underwent three forms of the visual IT test using the PEST adaptive procedure. The three visual IT tests were the standard vertical lines test, a horizontal lines test and a test using geometric shapes (Longstreth et al, 1986). Subjects were also tested on the Alice Heim 5 test -an IQ test which discriminates among high ability subjects.…”
Section: New Expe:riments With Auditory Inspec'tioi'l Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por exemplo, sugeria-se que tais coefi cientes oscilavam consoante a aplicação dos testes de inteligência era feita com ou sem limites de tempo (Carroll, 1981;Schwartz, Griffi n & Brown, 1983;Vigneau, Blanchet, Loranger & Pépin, 2002) ou consoante se controlava ou não o efeito da prática acumulada ao longo do experimento (Longstreth, 1984;Longstreth, Walsh, Alcorn & Szzeeszulski, 1986). Respondendo a estas críticas, Vernon, Nador e Kantor (1985) verifi caram que as correlações se mantinham independentemente das condições (com e sem limites de tempo) em que eram aplicados os testes de inteligência.…”
Section: S Ribeiro E L S Almeidaunclassified