2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00258-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background charges and quantum effects in quantum dots transport spectroscopy

Abstract: We extend a simple model of a charge trap coupled to a single-electron box to energy ranges and parameters such that it gives new insights and predictions readily observable in many experimental systems. We show that a single background charge is enough to give lines of differential conductance in the stability diagram of the quantum dot, even within undistorted Coulomb diamonds. It also suppresses the current near degeneracy of the impurity charge, and yields negative differential lines far from this degenera… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Such feature could be found in single quantum dot where additional parallel channels via edge states are opened for tunneling or when trap-assisted tunneling is present 13 or in the case of spin dependent transport. 14 Here, the position of the NDC clearly follows the shape of the Coulomb diamonds, at a fixed distance from their edges.…”
Section: A Negative Differential Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Such feature could be found in single quantum dot where additional parallel channels via edge states are opened for tunneling or when trap-assisted tunneling is present 13 or in the case of spin dependent transport. 14 Here, the position of the NDC clearly follows the shape of the Coulomb diamonds, at a fixed distance from their edges.…”
Section: A Negative Differential Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since in the lower bias triangle the total observed SET current is proportional to the average fraction of the time the donor is unoccupied, the observed SET current is thus significantly reduced along the resonance lines. Reductions in the conductivity such as we see have also been explained using a model of a single charge trap [15]. However, for this to explain the features we see would require multiple accidental charge traps in the vicinity of the quantum dot, each with indistinguishable capacitive couplings to the gates, a possibility we find very unlikely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…We observe between 1 and 5 of such anomalies in each device in different ranges of the top-gate voltage V g . In previous reports of anomalous behaviour of the SET 25,[27][28][29] , the coupling between the SET island and the single dopants has been predominantly capacitive. Here we observe dramatic increase of the current through the SET due to resonant tunneling through single dopants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(A13) can be interpreted as a kinetic energy term, and thus, can be included into the kinetic-energy term of Eq. (27) as an additional energy level in the SET island. The second term represents the usual Coulomb energy of an island, with the difference that the donor appears as part of that island too (the total charge being n+N ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%