Jackson and Koppen9s paper reports the results of an eastwest gravimeter traverse across the central part of Nares Stmit (Kane Basin, Fig. I), the narrow seaway sepawting Greedand from Ellesmere Island. Their study is one of several recent field projects designed to clarify the tectonic relationship between the opposing landmasses across the North American -Greedand (NA -GR) plate boundary. As mentioned in the opening paragraph of Jackson and Koppen9s paper, the tectonic origin of Nares Strait has been the subject of considerable controversy. In 1980, Nares Strait was the topic of an international symposium aimed at determining whether the strait is the site of major continental displacements (Dawes and Kern 1982).Jackson and Koppen state (p. 1323) that "the gravity data along Nares Strait were collected to test, by forward modelling, if the collision zone predicted by plate reconstmctions and changes in crustal structure suggested by other geophysical anomalies were consistent with it. ' The two gravity profiles obtained show a negative free-air anomaly over the western part of Kane Basin, with values in the range of -108 to -120 m@d (1 mGal = 10 pm S-'), Fmm these data, twodimensiond crustal models are developed in an attenapt to identify the cause of the anomaly. The authors conclude that the regional gravity pattern is consistent with plate reconstmctions that require Nares Strait to be a major suture zone of collided continental crust. Thus, the gmvity data are said by Jackson and Koppen to support the plate motion scenarios outlined by Skvastava (1985) and Jackson (1985).The new gravity data are a very welcome addition t s the existing sparce geophy sical infomation from the region. ' 'A shortage of clear geophysical data from the sea floors in the Strait and in all the adjacent ~g i o n " is one of the general appraisals made by Wilson (1982) In the Nares Strait symposium volume. However, it is the regional application of the two gravity profiles that span but a 20 h wide zone, in terns of a 600 b long rift (the NA -GR plate boundary), without consideration of other gmvity surveys in the region be. g . , Sobczk and Stephens 19'74), that prompts this discussisn. This approach allows the authors to interpret their gmvity data as being indicative of a late Phanerozoic plate tectonic event (more precisely an effect of several predicted plate motions in the period defined by sea-floor spreading anomalies 34 and 13) rather than of Earth processes or events in the previous 3.5 Ma of Earth history.