2013
DOI: 10.3109/2000656x.2013.787934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation and validation of the Danish version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire

Abstract: The need for validated outcome measures is increasing. The purpose is to translate and validate the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) in Danish. Translation was done by an expert panel followed by evaluation of a lay panel and a field test on 10 patients. Sixty patients with wrist fractures were included. Both lay panel comments and field test revealed issues not dealt with by the expert panel, and a final version of the Danish PRWE was made. The validation process then continued and reliability results. w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Internal consistency is a concept that measures the extent to which items in a questionnaire are homogenous; a consistent examination will measure the same concept with similar results using multiple items. Our Cronbach's α of 0.96 demonstrated that PRWE-S achieved a good correlation between items in a scale, and our finding was correspondent with other studies [11][12][13][14][15][16][18][19][20][21][22][23]26 particularly when compared with MacDermid's reported value for the original (English) PRWE of 0.98. 31 Test-retest reliability was moderate, likely indicating that patients had changes in their status during the period between examinations, despite a short interval averaging only 10 days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Internal consistency is a concept that measures the extent to which items in a questionnaire are homogenous; a consistent examination will measure the same concept with similar results using multiple items. Our Cronbach's α of 0.96 demonstrated that PRWE-S achieved a good correlation between items in a scale, and our finding was correspondent with other studies [11][12][13][14][15][16][18][19][20][21][22][23]26 particularly when compared with MacDermid's reported value for the original (English) PRWE of 0.98. 31 Test-retest reliability was moderate, likely indicating that patients had changes in their status during the period between examinations, despite a short interval averaging only 10 days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar values were reported by Schønnemann et al during the translation and validation of the Danish version of PRWE in patients with wrist fractures. 19 Our study had limitations. The sample size was small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The questionnaire included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), which have been validated and translated into Danish [ 21 , 22 ]. The DASH is a 30-item questionnaire designed to measure disability and symptoms of both upper limbs together [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is self-explanatory and quickly completed (approximately seven minutes). It is currently being used in most prospective studies related to wrist and hand problems (9,10).…”
Section: Patient-rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (Prwhe)mentioning
confidence: 99%