PRWHE-skjemaet på norsk – vurdering av hånd- og håndleddsplager

Reigstad, Ole; Vaksvik, Tone; Lütken, Teresa; Berg, Jorun

doi:10.4045/tidsskr.13.1163

Cited by 16 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To adapt the PRWHE for a Danish context, focus was placed on assessing the same construct as the original Canadian version. As seen in other cross-cultural adaptations item 6 was changed from 'turning a door knob' to 'turning a key', 12,28,31 and the unit of measurement was changed from 'pounds' to 'kilograms'. 12,15,31 PRWHE-DK showed excellent test-retest reliability, with an ICC 2.1 of 0.94 and a high level of internal consistency above 0.90.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As seen in other cross-cultural adaptations item 6 was changed from ‘turning a door knob’ to ‘turning a key’, 12,28,31 and the unit of measurement was changed from ‘pounds’ to ‘kilograms’. 12,15,31…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…11 The PRWHE has been translated into several languages. [12][13][14][15] For many decades, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure 16,17 has been used internationally as an outcome measure among patients with hand-related disorders to measure patients' perspectives. However, in many recent studies, the PRWHE has been used together with, or instead of, DASH.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Danish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation questionnaire: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, test–retest reliability and construct validity

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

there is a growing need for valid, reliable and standardized patient-rated outcome measures for use in clinical practice and research. The PRWHE is a self-reported assessment of hand-related disorders that measures pain and functional difficulties in activities of daily living. The purpose of this study was to: 1) translate and cross-culturally adapt the PRWHE into Danish and, 2) assess the reliability and construct validity of the Danish version in patients with hand-related disorders. Methods: The PRWHE has been translated and cross-culturally adapted into Danish using the dual-panel approach. A total of 97 patients with diverse hand-related disorders and a mean age of 52.6 (sd 15.2) participated in the psychometric testing. They were assessed on two occasions. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2.1) to assess test-retest, Cronbach's alpha (CA) assessing internal consistency and a Bland-Altman plot assessing measurement error. Construct validity was investigated by evaluating the relationship between the Danish PRWHE (PRWHE-DK) and the Danish validated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH). 2 Results: Psychometric testing demonstrated an excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Danish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation questionnaire: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, test–retest reliability and construct validity

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 13 , 14 QALYs were calculated with the area under the curve (AUC) method combining time and the utility indices. Other outcome measures from the clinical trial included the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (Quick-DASH), 15 , 16 Patient Rated Hand and Wrist Evaluation score (PRWHE), 17 , 18 and a single question on satisfaction with wrist function.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims The purpose was to compare operative treatment with a volar plate and nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and over in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods A cost-utility analysis was performed alongside a randomized controlled trial. A total of 50 patients were randomized to each group. We prospectively collected data on resource use during the first year post-fracture, and estimated costs of initial treatment, further operations, physiotherapy, home nursing, and production loss. Health-related quality of life was based on the Euro-QoL five-dimension, five-level (EQ-5D-5L) utility index, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated. Results The mean QALYs were 0.05 higher in the operative group during the first 12 months (p = 0.260). The healthcare provider costs were €1,533 higher per patient in the operative group: €3,589 in the operative group and 2,056 in the nonoperative group. With a suggested willingness to pay of €27,500 per QALY there was a 45% chance for operative treatment to be cost-effective. For both groups, the main costs were related to the primary treatment. The primary surgery was the main driver of the difference between the groups. The costs related to loss of production were high in both groups, despite high rates of retirement. Retirement rate was unevenly distributed between the groups and was not included in the analysis. Conclusion Surgical treatment was not cost-effective in patients aged 65 years and older compared to nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in a healthcare perspective. Costs related to loss of production might change this in the future if the retirement age increases. Level of evidence: II Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1027–1034.

show abstract

“…Postero-anterior and lateral radiographs were taken to confirm bone union (bone trabeculae crossing the arthrodesis, integration of the bone graft and the plate fixation). Subjectively, the patients rated their wrist pain using a visual analogue scale (0-10) for radial-sided pain and ulnar-sided pain at rest and pain with activity, the quickDASH score and the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation, translated to and approved in Norwegian (Reigstad et al, 2013) where completed. At follow-up, the patients were asked if they regretted choosing arthroplasty in first place.…”

Section: Follow Up and Evaluationsmentioning

confidence: 99%