1963
DOI: 10.1021/ja00899a022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ρ-ρ Relation and Transmission of Electronic Effects in the Reaction of Phenylacetic Acids with Diphenyldiazomethane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative coefficient of 0.43 for β‐F seems to be reasonable because the attenuation factor by intervening the methylene group between a reaction center and the substituent is observed to be ca. 0.5 in many cases 16,16a),16b),17,18 . The same is true for 0.22 in the case of γ‐F.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative coefficient of 0.43 for β‐F seems to be reasonable because the attenuation factor by intervening the methylene group between a reaction center and the substituent is observed to be ca. 0.5 in many cases 16,16a),16b),17,18 . The same is true for 0.22 in the case of γ‐F.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This may lead to the possibility of an empirical approach for prediction of GA although the substituent constant values are not available for all kinds of R f SO 2 groups except the CF 3 SO 2 group. We hypothesize that the inductive effects of fluorine atoms on the stability of the acid's conjugate anions should depend on the distance (or number of “insulating” carbon atoms) between the formal anionic center and the fluorine atom 16,16a),16b),17–20 and on the number of fluorine atoms contained in the R f moiety. We propose that the acidities of fluorine‐containing sulfonylimides may be described in terms of Eqn as a simple approximation: GA=ρitalicN)(α+bitalicN)(β+citalicN)(γ+ditalicN)(δ+ewhere GA is the gas‐phase acidity, and N (α) , N (β) , N (γ) , and N (δ) are the numbers of fluorine atoms at α, β, γ, and δ position of the SO 2 group, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the R f group on acidity of PhC H ClR f and PhC H FR f , where R f is the tertiary fluoroalkyl group, would be determined by the accumulated inductive effect of fluorine atoms contained in the R f moiety and by the polarizability of the R f group depending on its size because the β‐fluorine negative hyperconjugation is absent in the acid's conjugate anions. Because the inductive effects of fluorine atoms on the stability of the conjugate anions should depend on the distance (or the number of insulating carbon atoms) between a formal anionic center and fluorine and on the number of fluorine atoms contained in the fluorinated alkyl group, and we previously proposed an empirical Eq. as a simple approximation for prediction of gas‐phase acidities of polyfluorinated alkanes having no β‐fluorine …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acidity of C H 3 C(R f 1 )(R f 2 )R f 3 and PhC H 2 C(R 1 )(R 2 )R 3 should be determined by the accumulated inductive effect of fluorine atoms contained in the R f moiety and by the polarizability of the R f group depending on its size, because the β‐fluorine negative hyperconjugation is absent in the conjugate anions of such carbon acids having no β‐fluorine atom. Because the inductive effects of fluorine atoms on the stability of the acid's conjugate anions should depend on the distance (or number of insulating carbon atoms) between a formal anionic center and fluorine and on the number of fluorine atoms contained in the polyfluorinated hydrocarbon, we proposed an empirical approach Eqn for prediction of gas‐phase acidity GA=0.25emρFtrue(Nβ0.25emprefix+0.25emaNγ0.25emprefix+0.25embNδtrue)0.25emprefix+0.25emc where N (β) , N (γ) , and N (δ) are numbers of fluorine atoms at β, γ, and δ positions of the formal negative charge center, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%