2002
DOI: 10.1021/jp026388x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B-Side Electron Transfer in the HE(M182) Reaction Center Mutant fromRhodobacter sphaeroides

Abstract: The histidine (H) ligand of the bacteriochlorophyll monomer molecule on the B-side of the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter (Rb.) sphaeroides was replaced with a glutamic acid residue (E) (mutant HE(M182)). The photochemical properties of this mutant are markedly different from those of wild-type RCs. The excited state of the initial electron donor (P*) decays with a lifetime of 2.8 ± 0.1 ps, which is about 10% faster than in wild-type RCs. The faster decay of the excited state is due to an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this symmetry, only one branch of the cofactors is active in the electron transfer process. Extensive characterization of modified RCs has led to the general conclusion that the asymmetry of electron transfer is largely due to differences in the energetics of the two possible pathways (21)(22)(23)(24). Models have been proposed suggesting a variety of interactions involving the cofactors that could lead to the asymmetry of electron transfer despite the overall structural symmetry; however, alterations of a significant fraction of the amino acid residues surrounding the cofactors have lead to only a limited activation of the second branch (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this symmetry, only one branch of the cofactors is active in the electron transfer process. Extensive characterization of modified RCs has led to the general conclusion that the asymmetry of electron transfer is largely due to differences in the energetics of the two possible pathways (21)(22)(23)(24). Models have been proposed suggesting a variety of interactions involving the cofactors that could lead to the asymmetry of electron transfer despite the overall structural symmetry; however, alterations of a significant fraction of the amino acid residues surrounding the cofactors have lead to only a limited activation of the second branch (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[58][59][60][61] Calculations and experiments have provided estimates or bracketed ranges for the free energies of the charge-separated states in the wild-type RC: P + B L -0.05-0.1 eV below P*; 29,50,51,[62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] P + H L -∼0.25 eV below P* when relaxed; [71][72][73][74][75] P + B M -0.1-0.2 eV above P* and P + H M -below P* by no more than ∼0.15 eV and probably within 0.1 eV. [50][51][52][76][77][78][79] Systematic efforts to manipulate the free energy differences of the L-and M-branch charge-separated states by site-directed mutagenesis of key amino acids, including those near B M and B L , have led to mutant RCs in which electron transfer to the M branch competes effectively with charge separation to the L branch, yielding P + H M -(reviewed in ref 80). In one such strategy in Rb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A) the purple bacterial reaction centre exhibits a marked functional asymmetry, with only the so‐called A‐branch of cofactors between the P BChls and the Q A ubiquinone being used to catalyse transmembrane electron transfer. The structural and energetic basis of this asymmetry has been the subject of intense interest, and in recent years there have been several attempts to affect the balance of transmembrane electron transfer along the two branches through the application of site‐directed mutagenesis [15–26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a number of investigations into how the asymmetry of electron flow in the bacterial reaction centre can be changed, concentrating mainly on the picosecond time‐scale formation of the P + H B − radical pair in purified mutant reaction centres [15–26]. In the present report, we have used the Q A ‐excluding AM260W mutation as the basis for a series of multiple mutations aimed at affecting this asymmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%